1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

What do you think about this lens?

Discussion in 'Photography Forum' started by Savio, Jul 30, 2007.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Jul 30, 2007 at 5:02 PM #1
    Savio

    Savio Freelance Pimp

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    8,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Redondo Beach
    Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM Autofocus Lens


    I need something with better zoom I can carry around. I think this will do the trick. I'm heading to NYC twice this month...
     
  2. Jul 30, 2007 at 5:43 PM #2
    DireWolf

    DireWolf Full Access Member

    Posts:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    I don't use Canon, although I know they make great lenses. I do have a Nikon with a 24-120 Autofocus VR (vibration reduction). It's really the only lens I ever use with the Nikon. If Canon's is as good (and I don't doubt that it is), go for it.
    Happy snapping!
     
  3. Jul 30, 2007 at 7:07 PM #3
    Big Mark

    Big Mark Full Access Member

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    5,243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    I own it. after the kit, it was the first lens I bought. For the money, I can't imagine anything better. It's not the fastest thing in the world, but I'm thrilled with it. I've got a 10-22mm and a 7-300mm since I've bought my 28-135, and they're great lenses, but i still use my 28-135 the most.

    Check out my gallery - most everything in there is taken with that lens.
     
  4. Jul 31, 2007 at 12:06 PM #4
    Savio

    Savio Freelance Pimp

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    8,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Redondo Beach
    cool...

    where did you buy it?

    I'm getting an avg of 400 bucks at various online retailers...
     
  5. Jul 31, 2007 at 1:59 PM #5
    Big Mark

    Big Mark Full Access Member

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    5,243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    I got it at Best Buy and paid way too much, but I had a credit to burn, so I said screw it. I think I paid about $500 for it.
     
  6. Jul 31, 2007 at 2:48 PM #6
    Savio

    Savio Freelance Pimp

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    8,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Redondo Beach
    I just bought it for $397. I can not wait to try it out. Hopefully I'll get it before the tennis tournament this weekend, then NYC twice in August.
     
  7. Jul 31, 2007 at 3:42 PM #7
    Big Mark

    Big Mark Full Access Member

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    5,243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Up until now, have you just been using the 18-55mm?

    I'm not one of those that bash the kit lens, but the 28-135 is a nice step up. Also it's a great range. Very versitle and great as a single "carry around".
     
  8. Jul 31, 2007 at 5:47 PM #8
    Savio

    Savio Freelance Pimp

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    8,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Redondo Beach

    I haven't really had a chance to fully utilize my Rebel XT but I've been reading a bunch, taking some pictures but I really want to get into it now. So I thought I needed a decent starter lens. I thought about getting a 50 f/1.8 first b/c I like taking ports but I thought I get something with the best of both worlds.
     
  9. Jul 31, 2007 at 6:06 PM #9
    DireWolf

    DireWolf Full Access Member

    Posts:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    FWIW, I recently got a 50mm f 1.8 for my pentax and it's a fine lens but it really is of limited use to me. 50mm on a DSLR is like 75mm on a film camera and it makes me stand pretty far back from my subject, which in my case is usually my wife's floral work, but it would be the same I think with most subjects indoors where limited space is an issue. If I get another prime, I'm going shorter - 35mm or less.
    JMHO.
     
  10. Aug 1, 2007 at 10:18 AM #10
    Big Mark

    Big Mark Full Access Member

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    5,243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003

    I've got the 50 1.8 too. I honestly don't use it THAT often, but it seems like I have a MUCH higer "keeper" ratio when I do. I agree with DW, it's not for everything, but it's great at what it does. And for $80, you can't beat it with a stick.

    That being said, I'm thinking about upgrading to the 50mm 1.4 - just for the faster focusing and better sharpness at 1.8 and 2.0. If I do, I'll make you a deal on my 1.8 - if you're still interested.
     
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page