This parting is painful, unavoidable from charlotte.com aboout Mooos

Dukesuckgounc

Let's go Panthers
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
9,431
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
43
Location
Near you
Posted on Sat, Feb. 26, 2005






Tom Sorensen











We all have a budget, and if we bust it we better have a compelling reason. As good as Muhsin Muhammad was last season, he's not a compelling reason. The Carolina Panthers had no choice but to let him go.

Muhammad, who has been a Panther for life, was due a $10 million bonus next week and would have made $12.5 million next season. The only way he could have stayed with Carolina was to take a massive pay cut, and he chose not to, so he's gone. The Panthers jettisoned him Friday.

Only elite receivers command the money Muhammad was due, and you can't be one of the best receivers in the league when you're not the best receiver on your team.

What he has working for him: He's among the best blockers at his position in the league, he's big, he works hard, runs great routes and is in superb condition.

What he has working against him: He'll be 32 when the season begins, he is not terribly fast and he has gone through periods in which he's had trouble hanging onto the ball. Some of those periods lasted several years.

And he has never admitted he dropped a pass. One time I wanted to hear him say it. We all have to have goals, and this was one of mine. Now I'll never get the chance.

The bad part II: His two best seasons, 1999 and 2004, came when he was playing for a new contract.

The Panthers obviously are a better team if Muhammad is on it. When he was good, in 1999 and 2000, 2003 and 2004, he played with a quality quarterback. When the Panthers paired him with Steve Beuerlein and Jake Delhomme, Muhammad excelled.

Only when former coach George Seifert ran Beuerlein off and presented the offense to Jeff Lewis, who was to quarterbacks what Sean Gilbert was to defensive linemen, did Muhammad disappear.

Lewis, Gilbert and Seifert also disappeared, and have yet to emerge. Although Steve Smith emerged as Delhomme's principal target, Muhammad developed into one of the league's better complementary receivers.

Smith was the fearless fast guy with the good hands, and Muhammad played off him beautifully. When Smith got hurt -- he broke his leg in the 2004 opener against Green Bay -- Muhammad became the star.

Fans never embraced Muhammad the way they have Mike Minter or Jake Delhomme, Sam Mills or Wesley Walls. But he was more than a guy who played in Charlotte. His foundation raised thousands of dollars for kids, and when the school his children attended needed a speaker, it always could call on him.

Muhammad is a good player and a tough player and that will be his legacy here. Somebody is going to drop a multi-million-dollar contract on him, and he'll catch it.

You can't skew your salary cap to accommodate a player unless you know he will excel. With Muhammad, you don't know.

Carolina's concern has to be this. The two times the Panthers found a quarterback capable of throwing a forward pass, Muhammad thrived.
 
I still don't understand the playing for a contract in 1999. His original deal went through 2000 so he wasn't going anywhere.
 
blackcatfan said:
I still don't understand the playing for a contract in 1999. His original deal went through 2000 so he wasn't going anywhere.
He signed in Jan. 2000, that actually was a contract year. And then he had a hell of a 2000, which shoulda shut anybody up that wanted to bluster the fucking "contract year" nonsense.
And, of course, this year wasn't a contract year.
 
George Seifert is the Reason why the panthers had Moooooooos in 2000.Called me crazy but i think the panthers should sew him.For makeing this team a joke Sign old FA.
 
magnus said:
And, of course, this year wasn't a contract year.

Surely you don't believe that. :nono:

He might have technically had a year left on his contract but, anybody that has a clue about the cap knows this was a contract year
 
cantgetright said:
Surely you don't believe that. :nono:

He might have technically had a year left on his contract but, anybody that has a clue about the cap knows this was a contract year
Nope. it was a point of renegotiation, just as were many years before it. The idea that Muhsin had a better year because he wanted to cash in is ludicruous - but sometimes people need ways to rationalize something in order to blame the player.
 
magnus said:
Nope. it was a point of renegotiation, just as were many years before it. The idea that Muhsin had a better year because he wanted to cash in is ludicruous - but sometimes people need ways to rationalize something in order to blame the player.

I'm not saying he played harder because of his contract status. Muhsin had a better year for 4 reasons I believe.

1. Smith was hurt
2. Davis and Foster were hurt
3. 2nd year with same QB
4. Rule changes helped Moose from getting mauled down the field.
 
magnus said:
He signed in Jan. 2000, that actually was a contract year. And then he had a hell of a 2000, which shoulda shut anybody up that wanted to bluster the fucking "contract year" nonsense.
And, of course, this year wasn't a contract year.

Ditto....102 catch season AFTER he signed his new contract. Then in '01 it was Weinke and '02 Peete....your not going to catch 90 balls from either of those guys. However, it looks like the Bears are going to give him $5-$6 mil a year.....Good Luck Moose.
 
cantgetright said:
I'm not saying he played harder because of his contract status. Muhsin had a better year for 4 reasons I believe.

1. Smith was hurt
2. Davis and Foster were hurt
3. 2nd year with same QB
4. Rule changes helped Moose from getting mauled down the field.
:applause: This are very 4true reason .But at some time you ask w any player in any sports NFL NBA NHL MLB. they will tall you that they player harde when there contract about to run out
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,039
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top