The tackle eligible

magnus

Chump-proof
Joined
Feb 5, 2002
Posts
53,697
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Location
anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
...not for gimmick.
...not to feed the DT ego.
...not for anything but force. Why not?

...other than that we don't have a young, athletic tackle who can run block well? If Tuten were healthy, it may work.

But this is where Nelson comes in. I think he could succeed with it.

As for the predictability, we're talking about a team with a minimum amount of plays, that tends to always use the first option in a passing play, and tends to mix it up with formation rather than actual innovation or difference. A team that's pretty obvious about what it does.

Seeing Green Bay and Oakland do it with some success suggests that, as a formation adaptation, it's something we could do well with. Nelson can get to the second level, can pin the DE inside, and can do something other than be the second level return guy inside.
 
why can't Kyle play the tackle spot for that?
 
not a bad idea, a guy like Matt Campbell would excell at something like this. A TE converted to O-line. Nelson's versatility does suggest that he might have some success at it.
 
Actually, if you saw ESPN's draft coverage, they showed a tackle catching a touchdown pass for his college team.

A fella by the name of Jordan Gross :D
 
Originally posted by magnus
Anyway, we might as well, right? We're not fooling anyone, so why not counter 8 in the box with six linemen?

An excellent point. Might even come in particularly handy when we run Davis or Foster to the outside.
 
Heck, we never throw the ball so why don't we just sign some more O-linemen, and suit them up with numbers in the 80's?
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,038
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top