Suspect run defense being tested for Saints

Paladin

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Posts
2,584
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
56
Location
Anderson, SC
Website
www.upstatehomeless.com
On a side note, Haslett closed camp to the media today as they began preparing for the 9/11 Panthers game, and is catching some heat for doing so.

http://www.nola.com/sportsflash/saints/index.ssf?/base/sports-7/112473207797180.xml&storylist=saints


Suspect run defense being tested for Saints
8/22/2005, 1:38 p.m. CT
The Associated Press


METAIRIE, La. (AP) — The New Orleans Saints' suspect run defense is getting severely tested during the preseason.

The Saints have made improving their run defense a high priority after finishing 30th in the NFL against the run last season, giving up an average of 140.8 yards per game. So far in the preseason they have played Seattle, the eighth-best rushing offense last season, and New England, the seventh-best.

Next up on Friday is Baltimore and the ninth-best rushing offense.

After two games the Saints are allowing the most rushing yards in the NFL, 177 per game.

"That is something I'm concerned with, and we're going to stress it and keep trying to work on it and do whatever we have to do to fix it," coach Jim Haslett said. "I think if we can stop the run, we have enough guys who can rush the passer and guys on the back end who can make plays."

The news wasn't all bad in the 37-27 victory over the Patriots last week. New Orleans allowed just 37 yards rushing, on 10 carries, in the first half, though the Patriots didn't play Corey Dillon, who was third in the NFL with 1,635 rushing yards last season. Their backups yielded 101 yards on 12 carries in the second half.

"I was encouraged in the first half, but they didn't have Corey Dillon, and he's a great running back," Haslett said. "But they had their starting line in there, so I thought we did a nice job with that. But the bottom line is we gave up too many yards rushing. Our second group has to do a good job too because some of those guys are going to play also."

___

Defensive tackle Johnathan Sullivan, a No. 1 draft choice in 2003 who has been very disappointing in two seasons, is being given a chance to help shore up the run defense. He has moved up from the third team to share first-team snaps with Willie Whitehead and Howard Green.

Those three are rotating on the first team while starter Brian Young recovers from a sprained knee suffered against the Patriots. Young is expected to miss the rest of the preseason, but be ready for the season opener Sept. 11 at Carolina.

Sullivan had 15 plays and four tackles against New England.

"Johnathan has played well in both games," Haslett said. "He had 15 plays and he had four tackles (against New England). "He'll get a lot more playing time this week, so I think these next couple weeks will be big for him."

___

Haslett said No. 1 draft choice Jammal Brown, the starting right offensive tackle, is expected back Tuesday after missing two days of practice because of a sore left shoulder. ... Wide receiver Devery Henderson, a No. 2 draft choice who was inactive for all but two games as a rookie last season, is taking advantage of injuries to Az-Zahir Hakim (hamstring) and Talman Gardner (ankle) in the battle for the third receiver spot. ... Monday was the Saints' last two-practice day. New Orleans had eight two-a-days during training camp, which officially ends Wednesday.
 
The Saints had the 32nd ranked D. In the off season they added one player on D. How does the coach expect them to improve?

There are none of their LBs ranked in the top 50 in the league.

Source; usatoday.com/sports/foot....nebacker_x.htm

cbs.sportsline.com/nflplaye....B?_row=sl

All positions are ranked - Pep is #1 in the first one.
 
They are going to be soft all year. They have a few players on the DL and in the secondary who are good against the pass but they can be run on. We did not have our top runningbacks last game with them but looks like we might have Stephen Davis for this one and we should at the least have Foster.
 
Honestly (and it's a bit of a hunch), I don't think we are going to fare very well on the ground early on this year. The Saints weren't very soft on the run when we lost to them in January. We have New England week 2, another game where I don't forsee a whole lot of success on the ground.

What worries me most is the o-line, and the fact that they have looked awesome in pass protection, but like dog shit for the running game. Gotta pick it up.
 
I don't think we have seen anything of what this OLine is capable of yet in the run blocking scheme. That's just not something Fox and Henning will expose just yet. If this line cannot make our RBs go better than last years running game, then I will be astonished. Not to mention pissed.
 
I do think we're going to run on the Saints a lot, and I'm fine with that. They've upgraded their secondary, they've got pass rushers that typically whip our ass, and they've got only a MLB of the interior three that's even slightly worth consideration. I think we're at a strength inside, and if we can get the right angles outside, they won't pursue well.

What else do we have? depth at WR, which means we'll hopefully spread them out when we need to pass, and match up a guy like Gardner on a guy like Fakhir Brown. We also have good enough secondary targets (if we use them) that we can create quick strike opportunities to supplement the run. I don't like their OLBs in much regard at all, including the pass, so I think we can work the edges well.
 
magnus said:
I do think we're going to run on the Saints a lot, and I'm fine with that. They've upgraded their secondary, they've got pass rushers that typically whip our ass, and they've got only a MLB of the interior three that's even slightly worth consideration. I think we're at a strength inside, and if we can get the right angles outside, they won't pursue well.

What else do we have? depth at WR, which means we'll hopefully spread them out when we need to pass, and match up a guy like Gardner on a guy like Fakhir Brown. We also have good enough secondary targets (if we use them) that we can create quick strike opportunities to supplement the run. I don't like their OLBs in much regard at all, including the pass, so I think we can work the edges well.

and honestly, i dont care who they have in the secondary, we still have an advantage over whoever is covering Smith. Lets just keep Dwight Smith preoccupied with Foster and/or a TE (if they dont call out bluff on that last one, although Seidman could fly under the radar of some teams this year)
 
oh man...I bet Deshaun Foster might be a nice FF RB to have that first week
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,039
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top