New draft order?

Wp28

I had that dream again...
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
12,596
Reaction score
60
Points
48
Age
62
Location
Calypso, NC
Website
www.myspace.com
I think this is right, will the Jets now trade the #4 and the #29 to move up to the #2?

What are the Bronco's planning with the #15?

1 Houston
2 New Orleans
3 Tennessee
4 New York Jets
5 Green Bay
6 San Francisco
7 Oakland
8 Buffalo
9 Detroit
10 Arizona
11 St. Louis
12 Cleveland
13 Baltimore
14 Philadelphia
15 Denver (from Atlanta)
16 Miami
17 Minnesota
18 Dallas
19 San Diego
20 Kansas City
21 New England
22 Denver (from Washington)
23 Tampa Bay
24 Cincinnati
25 New York Giants
26 Chicago
27 Carolina
28 Jacksonville
29 Jets (from Denver)
30 Indianapolis
31 Seattle
32 Pittsburgh
 
Package them to move up further or move down for more picks. They could be looking for a RB with Anderson gone and only Bell/Fatso returning. Williams or White might still be there. Maybe O-line?
 
McFly41 said:
Package them to move up further or move down for more picks. They could be looking for a RB with Anderson gone and only Bell/Fatso returning. Williams or White might still be there. Maybe O-line?

I bet the Broncos don't take a RB in rd one. When have they ever? Shanny has had good luck finding nuggets that fit his system and making All Stars out of them. If Foster could stay relatively healthy and Shelton give us anything I would be thrilled
 
on a somewhat related note, if the Raiders sign Aaron Brooks do they fall out of the round 1 QB derby? one of the top 3 QB's might fall way way down on draft day.
 
Wp28 said:
on a somewhat related note, if the Raiders sign Aaron Brooks do they fall out of the round 1 QB derby? one of the top 3 QB's might fall way way down on draft day.

Curious "if" one of the big three dropped down to the Panthers, what with no glaring needs (with a sure fire fit WR) being there would the Panthers select one (say Cutler) and sit on him for 2 years? How much longer is jake cost effective (salary verses age and production)
 
PantherPaul said:
Curious "if" one of the big three dropped down to the Panthers, what with no glaring needs (with a sure fire fit WR) being there would the Panthers select one (say Cutler) and sit on him for 2 years? How much longer is jake cost effective (salary verses age and production)

I doubt it. Jake should have another five years in him. Good QBs often play at a high level into their late thirties. Brad Johnson is 37.....
 
Thelt said:
I doubt it. Jake should have another five years in him. Good QBs often play at a high level into their late thirties. Brad Johnson is 37.....
Especially since Jake didn't start playing with regularity until he was older. He doesn't have the wear and tear that "normal" qbs have.
 
Didn't I see a KFFL blurb last week that said due to cap reasons Denver wanted to trade a #1 this year for something next year?

Even as impeccable as our 2nd round picks have been, would you entertain any thoughts on trading this years 2nd and next years 2nd for a 1st?
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,038
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top