More Networking Headaches

DJ_Tet

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Posts
4,492
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
50
Website
Visit site
Hello

I am having what is probably a very basic home networking problem. I have two PCs with Windows XP Home running on them. They are both clean of viruii and spyware to the best of my knowledge. I have two network cards, one installed in each PC, and two modems, again one in each PC.

The setup will hopefully work like this.

One PC will have two printers attached to it, and the main copy of all the work files (Quickbooks, Excel, Word documents). I would like to share access to the printers and access to the work files on the other PC. Each PC should be able to modify the work documents seperately. Each PC will retain the right to go online individually, as there is only dial-up. The phone line setup is a dedicated fax/internet line, so each computer can dial in separately, but not at the same time. The second PC has both printer drivers installed and the programs used to access the work files.

To connect the two PCs I am using a Cat 5E Crossover cable.

I have tried running the Network Wizard to no avail. Perhaps I am not running it correctly.

On the control panel -> Network Connections I have modified the IP address of the first network adapter to 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2 on the second computer. Both have the subnet of 255.255.255.0 and the Network name MSHOME. Both computers have only one default user account, do I need to make administrator accounts on both PCs to make it work correctly?

When I plug the crossover cable into both network adapters, the physical connection is recognized, however there is no success in sending packets or pinging from one PC to the other.

Can anyone help? Am I missing an easy step?
 
Bootay said:
You already have a thread on this, no need to start a new one...



My other thread was about one pc and a completely different one, no matter, someone helped me solve my problem.
 
Don't mind him, DJ. He's just sore because I pointed out to him something about his precious IE that he doesn't want to admit in public.
 
mathmajors said:
Don't mind him, DJ. He's just sore because I pointed out to him something about his precious IE that he doesn't want to admit in public.

So far all I've seen is that you can't configure the IE pop-up blocker, and your wife surfs porn when you're not looking.
 
Bootay said:
So far all I've seen is that you can't configure the IE pop-up blocker, and your wife surfs porn when you're not looking.
I don't have an IE pop-up blocker, and I know good and damn well what my wife is surfing. You just refuse to believe your no-fault IE is a target for passive software installation. My God man, how do you survive in your industry?
 
mathmajors said:
I don't have an IE pop-up blocker, and I know good and damn well what my wife is surfing. You just refuse to believe your no-fault IE is a target for passive software installation. My God man, how do you survive in your industry?

I'm not the one whose wife gets spyware'd...my wife surfs just fine with IE.

FYI: I am not claiming IE isn't a target, but to claim Firefox isn't either is ignorant. I am claiming that people who are AFFECTED by the targeting are changing default security settings to enable this or actively participating in software installation, so it's their own fault.
 
I didn't say my wife gets it every fucking time she surfs. I'm amazed at your capacity to just make up shit whenever it suits you.

And I didn't claim Firefox isn't a target nor did I claim it's invulnerable. I'm still amazed at your capacity to just make up shit whenever it suits you.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,038
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top