finleye
como say what?
To me, the best offenses in the league are the one's who've (i) got the best collection of talent & (ii) embraced the information age - i.e., each week they are able to master the most amount of information (formations/route trees/protections/defenses) and process it in the shortest amount of time (usually via the hurry up) to allow them to stay a step or two ahead of the defense. These offenses, imo, have the greatest 'dynamic range' compared to the rest of the league: the most weapons, most thorough preparation, most consistent execution, and the most real-time schematic flexibility.
Teams like the pre-2011 Colts, the Saints, the Packers, & the Patriots all like to employ a faster tempo offense with a wide variety of weapons to exploit. And their schemes seem to be a hybridization of many different forms of offense from the past: the spread and/or run & shoot, Croyell's vertical passing/power running, West Coast principles, Power I + play action, wildcat and/or the zone read option, etc...
The more looks you have at your disposal, while also minimizing the number of subsitutions needed (constrained only by your personnel's lack of versatility), the more you can possibly deceive and/or confuse your opponent before the snap. In other words, the less you have to substitute different personnel groups, the less you limit the available plays from your playbook when in the hurry up. Modern offense are, in my mind, caught up in an arms race of sorts to see who can effectively operate the most up tempo offense given the least amount of different personnel groupings (which has the added bonus of wearing out defensive line, taking advantage of their general lack of aerobic fitness). Naturally, the tight end becomes emphasized in such offenses; they are regarded by some as the queen's of the proverbial chessboard. The rest of the roster is then tailored to this offense, with the defense built on the assumption you will be playing with a lead.
The Steelers are in a different category to me, one which I think the Panthers should continue to try and emulate. The Steelers' offense emphasizes physicality yet relies more on the passing game than it does on the running game. Dont get me wrong, they run it and run it well, but these days, the run is ultimately there to supplement the pass. Mike Wallace is arguably the best deep threat in the game, and Antonio Brown is a severely underrated #2 who has tremendous run after the catch ability (he also doubles as the punt returner), while veterans Jericho Cotchery & Hines Ward join the emerging Emmanual Saunders to round out Pitt's receiving core.
Plus, the Panthers have already established a pass first offensive identity under Chud. Newton, in fact, gives the Panthers more flexibility in the running department than Big Ben does. I would think, though, that a more physical presence in Legadu Naanee's receiver spot would be an upgrade for this offense. Someone with the strength to break a few tackles would be nice. Hopefully the staff will consider adding someone else to the receiving core, which to me is such a hodge podge group as it is:
Smitty - gamebreaker
Lafell - solid & trending up but may not fit Naanee's role in the long term
Naanee - serviceable
Edwards - enigmatic
Pilares - kickoff returner at worst, but upside is still unclear
Gettis - can only be considered intriguing until he plays & doesnt get hurt
Any possibilities from the upcoming free agent market? How about:
(1) Chaz Schilens (OAK) 6'4" 225 - 70+rec, 900+ yards, 7 TD's in four year career.
(2) Andre Caldwell (CIN) 6'0" 200 - 120+ rec, 1100+ yards, 6 TD's, 73 rushes in four year career.
(3) Josh Morgan (SF) 6'1" 215 - 130+ rec, 1700+ yards, 9 TD's in 4 yr career, 49ers were talking about extending him before he fractured his ankle, played in only 5 games this year.
(4) Early Doucet (ARI) 6'0" 212 - 110+ rec, 1250+ yards, 7 TD's in 4 year career, really broke out this year with 54/689/5, played with Lafell at LSU.
(5) Greg Camarillo (MIN) 6'2" 200 - 141+ rec, 1600+ yards, 5 TD's in five year career, also has 5 ff's on special teams and has returned punts.
Also, assuming Blackmon is gone by #8/9, how about some possible draft prospects: (the italicized quotes have been taken from http://walterfootball.com/draft2012WR.php)
(1) Alshon Jeffery 6'4" 230 (USCe) - I personally have never liked Jeffery. Could someone please inform me what I'm missing? What reasons are there to suggest Jeffery wont be the next Dwayne Jarrett or Mike Williams, a guy with ideal size who cant separate or make enough plays on the ball who could even eat his way out of the league?
(2) Michael Floyd 6'3" 225 (ND) - above average size/speed ratio, below average character concerns, conflicting reports on his route running and technique.
(3) Kendall Wright 5'10" 190 (Baylor) - luxury pick. my favorite wide out in the entire draft. Were we to trade back to #25 with Cleveland, for instance, Wright wouldnt be a big reach.
(4) Dwight Jones 6'4" 220 (UNC) has been discussed as nauseum, not as physical as one might expect but huge catch radius.
(5) Mohammed Sanu 6'2" 215 (Rutgers) - physical player with versatile skill set, would be an asset after the catch. "This year, Sanu has stayed healthy and displayed good speed to go along with his ideal size. He makes tough catches and can get open in all levels of the field."
(6) Marvin McNutt 6'4" 215 (IOWA) - "The 6-foot-4, 215-pounder could have even more production if he played in a better passing offense. McNutt has deceptive speed, good hands and runs good routes. He is capable of making big plays downfield with his speed or his size."
(7) Reuben Randle 6'4" 207 (LSU) - "Randle excels at running slant routes in the short to intermediate part of the field, and that should have a big appeal to teams that run the West Coast offense"
(8) Nick Toon 6'3" 217 (WISC) - top end speed and durability are the concerns here.
(9) Jordan White 6'0" 215 (Western Michigan) - most prolific receiver in college football according to the numbers with 127/1646/16, also a punt returner. Plays bigger than his size.
Teams like the pre-2011 Colts, the Saints, the Packers, & the Patriots all like to employ a faster tempo offense with a wide variety of weapons to exploit. And their schemes seem to be a hybridization of many different forms of offense from the past: the spread and/or run & shoot, Croyell's vertical passing/power running, West Coast principles, Power I + play action, wildcat and/or the zone read option, etc...
The more looks you have at your disposal, while also minimizing the number of subsitutions needed (constrained only by your personnel's lack of versatility), the more you can possibly deceive and/or confuse your opponent before the snap. In other words, the less you have to substitute different personnel groups, the less you limit the available plays from your playbook when in the hurry up. Modern offense are, in my mind, caught up in an arms race of sorts to see who can effectively operate the most up tempo offense given the least amount of different personnel groupings (which has the added bonus of wearing out defensive line, taking advantage of their general lack of aerobic fitness). Naturally, the tight end becomes emphasized in such offenses; they are regarded by some as the queen's of the proverbial chessboard. The rest of the roster is then tailored to this offense, with the defense built on the assumption you will be playing with a lead.
The Steelers are in a different category to me, one which I think the Panthers should continue to try and emulate. The Steelers' offense emphasizes physicality yet relies more on the passing game than it does on the running game. Dont get me wrong, they run it and run it well, but these days, the run is ultimately there to supplement the pass. Mike Wallace is arguably the best deep threat in the game, and Antonio Brown is a severely underrated #2 who has tremendous run after the catch ability (he also doubles as the punt returner), while veterans Jericho Cotchery & Hines Ward join the emerging Emmanual Saunders to round out Pitt's receiving core.
Plus, the Panthers have already established a pass first offensive identity under Chud. Newton, in fact, gives the Panthers more flexibility in the running department than Big Ben does. I would think, though, that a more physical presence in Legadu Naanee's receiver spot would be an upgrade for this offense. Someone with the strength to break a few tackles would be nice. Hopefully the staff will consider adding someone else to the receiving core, which to me is such a hodge podge group as it is:
Smitty - gamebreaker
Lafell - solid & trending up but may not fit Naanee's role in the long term
Naanee - serviceable
Edwards - enigmatic
Pilares - kickoff returner at worst, but upside is still unclear
Gettis - can only be considered intriguing until he plays & doesnt get hurt
Any possibilities from the upcoming free agent market? How about:
(1) Chaz Schilens (OAK) 6'4" 225 - 70+rec, 900+ yards, 7 TD's in four year career.
(2) Andre Caldwell (CIN) 6'0" 200 - 120+ rec, 1100+ yards, 6 TD's, 73 rushes in four year career.
(3) Josh Morgan (SF) 6'1" 215 - 130+ rec, 1700+ yards, 9 TD's in 4 yr career, 49ers were talking about extending him before he fractured his ankle, played in only 5 games this year.
(4) Early Doucet (ARI) 6'0" 212 - 110+ rec, 1250+ yards, 7 TD's in 4 year career, really broke out this year with 54/689/5, played with Lafell at LSU.
(5) Greg Camarillo (MIN) 6'2" 200 - 141+ rec, 1600+ yards, 5 TD's in five year career, also has 5 ff's on special teams and has returned punts.
Also, assuming Blackmon is gone by #8/9, how about some possible draft prospects: (the italicized quotes have been taken from http://walterfootball.com/draft2012WR.php)
(1) Alshon Jeffery 6'4" 230 (USCe) - I personally have never liked Jeffery. Could someone please inform me what I'm missing? What reasons are there to suggest Jeffery wont be the next Dwayne Jarrett or Mike Williams, a guy with ideal size who cant separate or make enough plays on the ball who could even eat his way out of the league?
(2) Michael Floyd 6'3" 225 (ND) - above average size/speed ratio, below average character concerns, conflicting reports on his route running and technique.
(3) Kendall Wright 5'10" 190 (Baylor) - luxury pick. my favorite wide out in the entire draft. Were we to trade back to #25 with Cleveland, for instance, Wright wouldnt be a big reach.
(4) Dwight Jones 6'4" 220 (UNC) has been discussed as nauseum, not as physical as one might expect but huge catch radius.
(5) Mohammed Sanu 6'2" 215 (Rutgers) - physical player with versatile skill set, would be an asset after the catch. "This year, Sanu has stayed healthy and displayed good speed to go along with his ideal size. He makes tough catches and can get open in all levels of the field."
(6) Marvin McNutt 6'4" 215 (IOWA) - "The 6-foot-4, 215-pounder could have even more production if he played in a better passing offense. McNutt has deceptive speed, good hands and runs good routes. He is capable of making big plays downfield with his speed or his size."
(7) Reuben Randle 6'4" 207 (LSU) - "Randle excels at running slant routes in the short to intermediate part of the field, and that should have a big appeal to teams that run the West Coast offense"
(8) Nick Toon 6'3" 217 (WISC) - top end speed and durability are the concerns here.
(9) Jordan White 6'0" 215 (Western Michigan) - most prolific receiver in college football according to the numbers with 127/1646/16, also a punt returner. Plays bigger than his size.