Playa
The coach is a near
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2004
- Posts
- 14,546
- Reaction score
- 220
- Points
- 63
- Age
- 46
- Location
- Crackerville
- Website
- www.youtube.com
I just read an article that asked what the NHL was going to do to improve scoring. I got to wondering, do you think maybe NHL brass were happy that scoring was low because better individual stats means higher salaries? It sounds like a conspiracy theory, but maybe Bettman was waiting until a cap was put into place before making any strong changes or having the refs enforce the rules beyond October.
Here is what I read:
HOW LOW CAN THEY GO?: Only 27 goals were scored by Tampa and Calgary in the 2004 Stanley Cup final, an average of less than four a game, that took a league mired in a swamp of obstruction and interference to a new low of punchlessness.
Baseball lowered the mound. Football freed up receivers and protected quarterbacks. In an era of sports when offense sells, what will the NHL do to open up the game? More tinkering?
Or, after a year in which no player got anywhere close to the magical 50-goal mark, will the Bettman administration simply let the Dead Puck Era continue?
It got so bad last spring that a hockey fan had to tune into the European soccer championships to see a few goals.
There were encouraging signs last winter when the league's GMs OK'd a variety of innovative notions designed to address the balance between offense and defense. Nothing has been implemented, however, and even the inability of the NHL to achieve growth in the U.S. television market hasn't stopped many traditionalists from arguing the game needs no alterations at all.
This may yet get worse before it gets better.
Here is what I read:
HOW LOW CAN THEY GO?: Only 27 goals were scored by Tampa and Calgary in the 2004 Stanley Cup final, an average of less than four a game, that took a league mired in a swamp of obstruction and interference to a new low of punchlessness.
Baseball lowered the mound. Football freed up receivers and protected quarterbacks. In an era of sports when offense sells, what will the NHL do to open up the game? More tinkering?
Or, after a year in which no player got anywhere close to the magical 50-goal mark, will the Bettman administration simply let the Dead Puck Era continue?
It got so bad last spring that a hockey fan had to tune into the European soccer championships to see a few goals.
There were encouraging signs last winter when the league's GMs OK'd a variety of innovative notions designed to address the balance between offense and defense. Nothing has been implemented, however, and even the inability of the NHL to achieve growth in the U.S. television market hasn't stopped many traditionalists from arguing the game needs no alterations at all.
This may yet get worse before it gets better.
