Gantt on needs and some names

Wp28

I had that dream again...
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
12,596
Reaction score
60
Points
48
Age
62
Location
Calypso, NC
Website
www.myspace.com
What are the needs?
Whenever free agency starts, the Panthers needs are clear. Here's a look at their offseason priorities, by position:

1. Defensive tackle -- They need a starter to replace Brentson Buckner, under the assumption Kris Jenkins is well again. Jordan Carstens played well in long relief last year, but they need an upgrade. La'Roi Glover makes sense if the money's right. But John Fox has long sought a wide-body in the middle, so don't be surprised if they make a run at Baltimore's Ma'ake Kemoeatu.

2. Offensive line -- Whether it's at center or right guard, the Panthers need to find a starter to shore up the inside of their line. Pro Bowl C LeCharles Bentley appears headed to Philadelphia, and Seattle put the transition tag on G Steve Hutchinson. A player such as New England G Stephen Neal or Tennessee C Justin Hartwig would fit the bill.

3. Outside linebacker -- With WLB Will Witherspoon headed into the market and SLB Brandon Short cut, they're going to need a pair. Figure Thomas Davis for one spot, but they'll still need to add another, since Chris Draft is best as the swing backup. There are a lot of comparable names out there (Nate Wayne, Na'il Diggs, Chris Claiborne, Shawn Barber), any one of which will probably work.

4. Second or third wideout -- Oh, they'll probably tell you they're confident Keary Colbert will rebound from his milk carton 2005 season. Figuring he can't be worse, coupled with the late emergence of Drew Carter, the need isn't as pressing as others. A David Givens or Joe Jurevicius is probably out of their price range, but a Brian Finneran might fit.

5. Experienced safety -- It doesn't appear they're in a hurry to retain Marlon McCree, for whatever reason. Even with Mike Minter and Colin Branch back, they need to add a cheap veteran (like McCree was last year) and possibly a draft pick.

-- Darin Gantt
 
I would go with:

1. DT - we will not do much if other teams can run against us, especially inside. If Jenkins is not back we are in trouble here.

2. RB - Foster or not we need another guy who can play, there is not much chance Foster makes it through the year. Count on Shelton?

3. WR/TE - we need a better second option in the receiving game. Smith needs some help.

4. LB - If we can't bring Spoon back then we have to roll the dice with Davis, I think Draft woudl be OK at SLB but then we are thin in the event Morgan goes down again or Davis flames out.

5. C - I think we are OK at RG with Mathis stepping in but we starting him and an inexperienced center sounds risky.
 
After hitting incentives written into their contracts, tackle Jordan Gross, tight end Kris Mangum and cornerback Chris Gamble realized raises last week. Gross' base salary went from $789,000 to $1.539 million, Mangum got a bump from $750,000 to $900,000 and Gamble went from $715,000 to $840,000.

The Panthers re-signed defensive end Otis Leverette last week. He finished the year on the practice squad here, after knocking around the league for parts of four seasons (17 games) with Washington, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle.

http://www.buzzfans.com/sports/football/panthers/story/5567654p-5009633c.html
 
>>but they'll still need to add another, since Chris Draft is best as the swing backup.

Between this and a little time to think over it, I still want Draft to be starting if it means getting more help elsewhere instead, and would rather draft a long-term relief situation at backup MLB, but this consensus about Draft being penciled in at backup MLB while SLB goes wanting seems to be strong enough for me to say that I disagree, but am probably wrong in that being how we'll handle things. And I'm currently feeling in the wrong for believing that doing so would be incorrect. I fucked up on that one, though I still believe having Draft and Seward outside would give us the cheapest combination of equitable talent at the 3 starting spots.



I don't know that Fox is so set on a wide-body inside, but we could probably use one. The problem is, we have two young, smaller guys already there, and getting a wide-body means basically not getting any better at rushing the passer. But we were relatively decent at it most times last year; I just feel that we're much better when we have a lot of interior push. I don't believe we'll have that if we get a Burton-type situational player.


That said, we worry about the run first, and the pass second. It is logical for this team to stop the run first. That player would allow us to stop the run about as well as we currently do, in theory. Having a player that does both, well, isn't generally cheap.

5. C - I think we are OK at RG with Mathis stepping in but we starting him and an inexperienced center sounds risky.
I like Mawae a lot. I'd be happy with him starting a year or two. Or, conversely, if we went with Hangartner and Mathis, with a veteran who could back either spot or take up the slack if one's fucking up, that's as well, too.




We really need another RB. In theory, I'd like it if Goings was at RB, not FB, and if Cramer was the legit backup FB and earned a bit of a living as a 3rd TE, as well. But I don't know if I like the three actives being Foster, Shelton, and Goings. I don't know if that leaves us the least bit better than we were post-Davis injury.

So I imagine it's back to FB for Goings, and we get a somewhat reliable, cheap FA. In theory I'd love a rook RB with first day talent, but I don't know if we'd go that young at RB behind a vet who's not good at staying on the field.

I'm assuming WR is the odd man out, and that we don't even look for another TE option, unless it's a later round guy to compete.
 
I have always been in awe of Ted Washington. I know he's 37 or so, but I don't think he missed any time and I think he still played well. Of course, I wouldn't pay big money or anything long term. I guess he'll get a nice contract offer.
 
So I imagine it's back to FB for Goings

As you know, the team has never valued a strong blocking FB, or TE, so I guess I would be okay with this move. I'd imagine it will be the same role that he had pre-2004. That's fine with me. We do need a stronger #2 option (or a starter if Foster fails to stay healthy). I'd prefer a vet.

And I don't think we'll be going after WR, at least not a player of starting caliber. Colbert will have to fuck up another year for that to happen. If Proehl does retire, we could certainly look to add depth.
 
I'd love to see an upgrade at RB, but if we could somehow get Mawae then we'd have a strong chance to be successful no matter who was back there.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,039
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top