Chargers vs. Texas on Sunday . . Where will the game be played at?

sds70

'King Kong Ain't Got **** On Me!!!!!'
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,770
Reaction score
86
Points
48
Age
56
Location
Queen City of the Dirty South
Website
www.facebook.com
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, why hasn't the league looked at playing this game in Los Angeles :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ? ? ? ? I mean, they've been working on getting a team back there for the last gazillion years, why not give the NFL fans in that area a bone and play the Chargers/Texans game there at the LA Coliseum, Rose Bowl, or Angels Stadium down in Anaheim ? ? ?


===========

Chargers practice in Arizona; await decision on game

Associated Press


TEMPE, Ariz. -- The San Diego Chargers, some of them forced from their homes by the threat of wildfires, worked out at the Arizona Cardinals' training facility on Wednesday and awaited word on where and when their next game will be played.

San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders planned to decide Thursday whether the Chargers will be able to play Houston as scheduled Sunday at their Qualcomm Stadium home field.


"We're waiting as long as we can to assess the need for a shelter as large as Qualcomm," the mayor's spokesman Fred Sainz said Wednesday.

"The mayor, when he spoke yesterday, said the concern is really not a football game, the concern was to assure people evacuated from their homes that they have a a safe place to go," Sainz said. "That remains our priority."

With the availability of Qualcomm Stadium uncertain, Texas Stadium in Dallas and Reliant Stadium in Houston have also been targeted as potential hosts for the game, eliminating Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe, Ariz., or locations in Los Angeles as potential sites.

The Chargers organization has remained in close contact with Sanders and the NFL on the matter.

"The Chargers continue to have only one goal: provide Mayor Sanders with the time and flexibility he needs to make whatever decision the Mayor believes is in the best interests of the people of San Diego," the team said in a statement. "The Chargers are fully prepared to implement whatever decision the Mayor makes, including either playing the game at Qualcomm Stadium or relocating the game to another facility outside the San Diego area."

Chargers president Dean Spanos said about 40 people in the organization had to evacuate their homes, including "17 or 18 players," because of the fires rampaging in the San Diego area. They included coach Norv Turner and quarterback Philip Rivers.

"So far I've heard that there haven't been any homes that have burned," Spanos said as the team began its practice, "but I haven't heard that officially."

An estimated 10,000 people were at the Qualcomm evacuation center on Wednesday.

"Obviously we'd like to play there, but it's totally up to the mayor," Spanos said. "I'm hoping this thing clears up by the weekend and we can play."

The team canceled its Monday practice in San Diego because of the smoky conditions, then decided to hold Wednesday, Thursday and Friday workouts in Arizona. The Cardinals have a bye this week.

The Chargers flew to Phoenix on Tuesday night, staying at a hotel in the north part of the city, far from the practice site. It was difficult to find housing on short-notice because those closer to the Cardinals' facility were booked.

"I think they're all coming together," Spanos said about the players. "In some ways, this kind of brings them all a little bit closer. It"s unfortunate the circumstances, but they're trying to make the worst situation the best possible situation that they can."

The team arrived in shoulder pads and helmets and began to work out as usual.

"I just talk to them out there for a little bit, and they seemed pretty upbeat," Spanos said. "The most important thing, at least from the football side, was to get here and get three days of practice in."

Spanos was en route to San Diego from the owners meeting in Philadelphia, where he had discussed possibilities for the Houston game with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.

"Things are improving, but there are still people in the stadium," Goodell said earlier in the day.

The commissioner said there was "a slight possibility" that the game would be moved to Monday night in San Diego.


"We're waiting for the mayor to make a decision and then we're going to decide what's in the best interest of the club to go on from there," Spanos said. "There's always the option to play Monday night. If that's what we have to do, we'll do it, so that gives us another day (for conditions) to get better."

Nearly four years ago to the day, wildfires forced the Chargers to move a Monday night game against Miami to Sun Devil Stadium on the Arizona State campus. Fifteen players on the San Diego active roster were part of that move.

The Cardinals have since moved to their new stadium in suburban Glendale, but that facility is booked through Sunday by the Cycle World International Motorcycle Show.

Spanos said he hadn't thought about the implications of playing a "home" game in Houston's Reliant Stadium. He said the priority is making sure the families of the players and Chargers staff members who have had to leave their homes are "all situated and taken care of."

 
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, why hasn't the league looked at playing this game in Los Angeles :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ? ? ? ? I mean, they've been working on getting a team back there for the last gazillion years, why not give the NFL fans in that area a bone and play the Chargers/Texans game there at the LA Coliseum, Rose Bowl, or Angels Stadium down in Anaheim ? ? ?

BECAUSE MORE PEOPLE WILL SHOW UP IN ANY OTHER CITY THAN THEY WOULD IN LOS ANGELES.
 
BECAUSE MORE PEOPLE WILL SHOW UP IN ANY OTHER CITY THAN THEY WOULD IN LOS ANGELES.

What killed football in LA was 2 crappy stadiums (LA Coliseum & Anaheim Stadium) and owners who had better deals floated in front of them (a return to Oakland and more money/new stadium in St. Louis respectively). NFL in LA can work, the league just has to figure out how to finance a $750 million state of the art stadium without using taxpayer money that's all :) :) . . . If I had $2 billion to burn, I would be glad to be the owner of the Los Angeles ____________ . . There's enough people & money out in SoCal to make the NFL work there.
 
What killed football in LA was 2 crappy stadiums (LA Coliseum & Anaheim Stadium) and owners who had better deals floated in front of them (a return to Oakland and more money/new stadium in St. Louis respectively). NFL in LA can work, the league just has to figure out how to finance a $750 million state of the art stadium without using taxpayer money that's all :) :) . . . If I had $2 billion to burn, I would be glad to be the owner of the Los Angeles ____________ . . There's enough people & money out in SoCal to make the NFL work there.

people in LA do not care about pro football. They have had more chances to make NFL football work, and it has failed. forget stadiums being the issue. LA is apathetic towards pro football. They eat up college ball, but not the pros.
 
people in LA do not care about pro football. They have had more chances to make NFL football work, and it has failed. forget stadiums being the issue. LA is apathetic towards pro football. They eat up college ball, but not the pros.

I think Larry Ellison (uber gazillionaire founder of ORACLE) has said in that past he would be interested in an NFL team. He could right the check himself and be the sole owner of the team. Plus there is enough corporate money in LA to make it work IMHO . . .

Al Davis would've stayed in LA, but the NFL screwed him out of that stadium deal in Hollywood Park, plus the proposed stadium in Irwindale (1985-87ish ? ? ) crapped out due to environmental issues (but he did get to keep the $10 million check from the city, which was nice!!!!), plus the planned renovation of the LA Coliseum never got off the ground in the 13 years that the team played there (the 1994 Northridge earthquake pretty much killed that plan). Oakland gave him a deal which he couldn't refuse (expanded Coliseum, skyboxes/club seat revenue, etc.) so he said 'Screw LA' and moved back the team back home (which never should've moved in the first place, but that's another thread for another day :) . . ).

As far as the Rams go, Georgia Frontierre was a St. Louis native and she wanted to move back to her hometown anyhow right? She just had to wait until the lease ran out in Anaheim before she could move the team . . Her late husband made the decision to move the team from LA to Anaheim back in 1980 if I remember correctly** . . .

** Talk about questionable circumstances, Carrol Rosenblooms death still smells fishy to me 30+ years later. How can a man who swims die drowning ? ? ? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm :) . . . .
 
Last edited:
basically, what you are saying is that OWNERSHIP moved teams out of LA. Ask yourself why. Was it because they wanted new stadiums? Sure, to a point. Ultimately, they move teams out because they don't make money. How do they make money? Ticket sales, parking, concessions, etc.

Sure, there are enough resources in LA to make it work. But it hasn't in the past. Why would it work now?
 
basically, what you are saying is that OWNERSHIP moved teams out of LA. Ask yourself why. Was it because they wanted new stadiums? Sure, to a point. Ultimately, they move teams out because they don't make money. How do they make money? Ticket sales, parking, concessions, etc.

Sure, there are enough resources in LA to make it work. But it hasn't in the past. Why would it work now?


LA is a 1 team NFL market, not 2 . . . Rams were doing pretty good in LA until the Raiders moved to town in 1982. Folks jumped on the Silver & Black bandwagon (remember, they won the Super Bowl 2 years after they got into town) early on, but then the Raiders went from good > mediocre and the fans stayed away (seeing crappy football in the crime riddled area around the LA Coliseum isn't the best way to spend a Sunday afternoon). As I said before, promised renovations to the Coliseum never panned out for Al Davis, which eventually led him to move back to Oakland in 1995.

Meanwhile, folks in Orange County, who just saw tons of tax money spent just a few years ago in expanding Anaheim Stadium to accomadate the Rams, didn't want to spend more money on a new football only stadium (which is similar to what happened to the Oilers in Houston). Add this to Georgia Frontiere's secret desire to move back home anyhow and the Rams. Due to political & tax reasons, you can't play the 'Build me a new stadium or else!!!' game in California. The Padres & Giants basically had to use private money to help pay for their new ballparks (and what the A's are trying to do now with their ballpark proposal down in Fremont).

THE BOTTOM LINE: I think the NFL can work in LA if you built a 68-71,000 seat football only stadium in the right place (again, I think the Dodger Stadium parking lot works the best). I say use the Cowboys new stadium in Arlington as a blueprint (minus the dome, which you obviously won't need in SoCal). There are way more than enough movie studios/corporate money in LA who would scoop up those sideline skyboxes/clubseats for the team to make lots & lots of money.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
158,340
Posts
2,824,039
Members
11,199
Latest member
garyfrank231
Back
Top