SOB !:banginghe
Scouts Inc. Evaluation: Hollins is a perfect example of an underachiever. He had all the potential in the world when he arrived at UCLA as a freshman. He has size, length and can run. But he was labeled soft by most coaches and scouts, and he never showed up when the team really needed him.
He has good hands and scores most of his points on offensive put-backs and by running the floor. He had a very productive NCAA Tournament, helping lead UCLA to the championship game. But he doesn't have much of a face-up game or much range on his jump shot. Hollins isn't a big fan of contact or fighting for position in the post.
He has potential to be a pro if he has time to develop, but it will take a lot of work. He's really a major project for a team to invest in, reminiscent a bit of Loren Woods of the Toronto Raptors. If Hollins gets drafted at all, he will go late in the second round.