The one where everyone - except Elric - agreed that you were wrong, but you kept posting because you are so wrapped up in your message baord standing.
Oh good grief, you're the one who is lying and you're telling one giant whopper at that. You're the one who almost everyone said was clearly wrong, including the Fox analyst who Elric emailed to ask about the situation. This is what I mean, vp. You're clearly smart, but the reason people don't value your opinion nearly as much as they do mine is because people have seen me admit when I'm wrong. They trust that I'm being genuine and saying what I believe, not just covering my ass. You they know will lie and humiliate yourself as in that red card argument just because you are pathologically incapable of admitting when you're clearly wrong. Think about that. Elric actually got a response from someone at Fox Sports who definitively said that you were wrong, and your reaction was to pretend that the guy had actually agreed with you. That's how mentally unbalanced you are.
And no, I didn't lie about what Sly said. I'm also sure that he did not say that I lied. By all means, produce a quote from him saying that I did.
Take the ACC tourney for instance - I highly doubt that the field would be favored over the top 2 seeds.
Over the top 2? No, probably not, but we're not talking about the top
two. We're talking about just the one
favorite, and I would imagine that the field is almost always (
and perhaps is always) favored over the one favorite. That's because of the mathematical odds involved in any single elimination iterative process. You just don't understand the math, which is why you continue to babble even after I've explained it to you. Note that you haven't challenged my math or any of the facts I've presented, because you can't. All you've done is to give excuses to keep arguing something you know to be false.
Just like your argument style, you pick and choose what to acknowledge as flaws.
I've acknowledged more flaws than anyone else on this board, and while you might have fun arguing that it's because I am more flawed than anyone on this board, the reality is that I'm far more honest about that sort of thing than you have ever been. In order to judge others, you have to be willing to judge yourself by the same standards. I do, you don't. When you start showing the slightest bit of honesty about your own failings, then you might be able to lecture me. Until then you're a hypocrite who tries to tear me down because I make you feel small and irrelevant.
big role and redesigning would actually be understatements.
So I guess you follow that old idea that if you're going to tell a lie, tell a really big one. Next I'm sure you'll say that the merger was your idea and that you headed the whole project. Good grief, do you even listen to yourself? What would someone who had a substantially more than just "
a big role in one of the largest mergers in US history" be doing spending his days on this board? Why would he have had so many different jobs with different companies? You get yourself in trouble when you embellish. Being involved at all, which I'm sure you were, would be worthy of note and is more than enough to brag about. Exaggerating your involvement only cheapens that while making you look stupid.
I'm sorry, this just doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Hell, most of your posts in this thread have been about me.
More bullshit from the consummate bullshitter. It's hard to imagine a bigger hypocrite than you. I didn't talk about you at all until you attacked me. My posts regarding you have been
responses to you. So yes, when I am attacked or otherwise confronted, I will address that person. You, on the other hand, have admitted to thinking and talking about me away from these forums, and you've clearly been following me around the boards looking for opportunities to start shit with me.
On the retarded scale, it's still a few hundred rungs above losing a fight over an internet message board.
Clowns like you keep pretending that it was something to be embarrassed about when the reality is that you're too much of a coward to ever stand behind your own words. The fact that you pretend to look down on men settling their differences as men always have just proves how emasculated you are. Fighting isn't something to be ashamed of, it's something to be proud of. You pretend to think otherwise because you're a pussy.
Apparently, you forgot delusional in your list above.
That would have a lot more credence if:
1) You hadn't already admitted that you do talk about me away from the boards.
2) That you clearly follow me around the forums and look for opportunities to take shots at me.
3) People weren't tracking down my personal details and Emailing them to other members of the board.
It's not paranoia if other people clearly are out to get you. Now I'll grant that I've given many of them good reason to, including yourself after all the many times I've humiliated you and made you look stupid. But you still have a choice as to whether you wallow in that bitterness or move on.
that it actually comprises a great deal of your self worth
A small mind like yours simply can't comprehend one like mine, which is why you struggle with these sorts of mistakes. You are the one who defines yourself based on your ability to win arguments, which is why you refuse to admit that you're ever wrong about anything. Meanwhile I have shown many times that I can admit when I'm wrong. I don't argue with other people to acquire self-esteem, I do it to get peace of mind because seeing other people say stupid or wrong things really bugs the shit out of me. I want to make those people stop saying stupid or wrong things because that's the only way I can be content. "Winning" isn't about making myself look good, it's just about making the other person stop irritating me with their stupidity. I can't get enjoyment from "winning" an argument any more than I could from getting As in school because it's generally not enjoyable if you expect it.
it's obvious that you think of me away from this board, and we all know that. I mean, you actually offered me money to fight you.
I've probably done that to lots of people who annoyed the shit out of me, especially the ones I believed to be cowards. But no, I really don't talk about you away from the board. There are people who participate in these forums that I do know offline, talk to on IM, or play games with me on X-Box Live. Any of them can tell you that when they bring up someone from these forums, I don't want to talk about it. I'm not consumed with grudges and bitterness like you are. In fact, I'm remarkably forgiving. If you could somehow stop being retarded then I imagine we'd get along fine. That's actually happened with some people I used to fight with regularly but now actually do favors for away from the boards.
Look, I am a narcissist so I quite enjoy talking about myself, but even I have my limits. The reality is that if you didn't like talking about me, you wouldn't. You bring up my life regularly because you're obsessed with it. You can make as many denials as you want, but the fact is that you do bring it up and you do talk about it incessantly. If you want to prove that you really don't care, then talk about something else.
