1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Texan waive Ragone

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by T_Schroll, May 19, 2006.

  1. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    So very true! I would like to see Carr with an Oline and a few weapons around him, as I think he is better than what we have seen so far.


    Hard for any QB to do much when getting sacked every other play.
     
  2. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    That's why you're not in the scouting business.
     
  3. klgeorge13

    klgeorge13 Molon Labe

    Posts:
    366
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    The sand hills
    I have heard quite a few of the "experts" state that Bush is not a great running back, that his real value lies in the fact that he can "do it all" and can create match-up problems. The problem I have with that is you get into the jack of all trades master of none situation. If hes not a great RB, not a great WR, does he merit going #1 overall just because he can do both?
     
  4. Purrsecutioner

    Purrsecutioner Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005

    Who knows? But our own Softli said he was a jakc of all trades, and master of all of them.
     
  5. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003

    I don't know, I could see him being a Faulk type player. Faulk could do it all, but Faulk sure wouldn't have been as good if all he was able to do is run the ball 30 times a game and nothing else.
     
  6. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    No, but Faulk would have still been good if he was just a runner.

    And the fact is he was a great reciever and he was great. He has the SB ring and 2 MVPs to prove it.
     
  7. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Faulk was a good runner no doubt, I just don't think he would have been as good if that was the only thing he could do, big difference in 15-20 rushes per game and 5 receptions and having to run 25-30 times a game.

    Not saying he couldn't do well that way, but we don't know for sure. My point is Bush is more suited for the split role that Faulk was, instead of having to grind out a lot of rushing attempts per game every game.
     
  8. McFly41

    McFly41 Work Hard...PLAY HARDER!

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    IOWA
    Bush is the second coming of Eric Metcalf, only better.
     
  9. McFly41

    McFly41 Work Hard...PLAY HARDER!

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    IOWA
    Split Ragone in two and you get Rag one, which describes how he throws. He rags one out there.
     

Share This Page