Smitty

liar

 

Retard! Funny, but still a retard! :imagestor

 

Ah yes, I forgot that I didn't actually appear at the Lair until you decided I was there, nevermind that other people remember me being there beforehand.

 

fuck off. i was thinking about giving free publicity to draft bot v3.742 but that's all down the shitter now chip. i hope dave w whoops your ass like those little kids whoop sadic's ass in ninjistu class.

 

I backed off that. I still don't remember you there at that point, but it has nothing to do with whether I say we argued at charlotte.com that day. that you were at the Lair at that point doesn't actually matter, because I actually showed you where more than just me remembers you and I arguing about this at charlotte.com.

 

.

 

"Both" sure does suggest "yes, charlotte.com". Again, none of which matters, because people did verify I said these things about Smitty. The rest was deflection.

Which means you were wrong, cock

 

Sup Purr. Its weird seeing all of the old posters from the lair posting here.

Yep, the same SS54. Although here, I have defended Branch here more often even though I never thought he was a great player to begin with (a good player who got undeserved crap, sort of like what you are saying in the chat with pressure.) and I did a lot more defending of Jake Delhomme at the lair with Cali. Although I am starting to see some of the same concerns he addressed in his argument.

I wasn't adamantly defending the pick, but I thought it was a good pick and said he had the potential to be a playmaker on our offense from what I read about him.

 

Indeed it does imply that we talked about it at both, but I never denied that. What I denied was your suggestion that this argument only happened there, and your idiotic assertion that I never posted on the Lair until much later. Hell, I dispute the fact that there was ever really an argument at all, as I don't remember you or anyone else really objecting to my criticism of the pick. At most people were saying "Wait and see. It was a reach, but we could use a new returner."

 

>>Hell, I dispute the fact that there was ever really an argument at all, as I don't remember you or anyone else really objecting to my criticism of the pick.


even though people remember it. And stuff. But luckily, we argued for pages about things even less meaningful than you being sore over an I-told-you-so that I've said maybe twice ever, and have always used the asterik of noting how hard I was on him in 02 and mid-03.