Panther Fans....

You pulled a stat that shows Colbert dropping 10 passes, but you could only name 3...urrgghh...make that 2 specifically. Which means this whole "he drops too many balls" agruement is stupid. And it's not like he's always on the recieving end of a Joe Montana spiral. The guy has proven he can step up in the clutch. He proved, catching 2 TD's against Tampa when our "pass happy offense" threw it 21 times, he can make the most of his oportunities.

 

Pete and Repeat sat on a log. Pete fell off. Who was left?

 

yep, the whole point of the thread was lost in an argument that has been made a thousand times with like 1 comment on the only new aspect of it

 

Yeah. They don't count as drops unless I personally throw the football to Colbert.

 

Yeah, that's exactly what a meant. You have to throw him the ball. Just like you have to burn Colin Branch for a 3rd down conversion for it to be valid in my mind. And calling out Colbert for dropping a game winnning TD pass, when in fact he caught it, isn't a minor oversight. It's making something up, or scapegoating someone to support your arguement. Some people fall for it, and I call this "Getting Magnu-tized". But you can't pull it off against me. I know this team way too well.

 

Ahh...see, at least pretending to be clear would help. No, not the gamewinner with :27, that's damn sure not what I said.

What I DID say, was when he dropped a pass before Moose's TD.

And since it doesn't exist, I'll post a news article about it. Enjoy. I'll take one "oops, Bed&Breakfast was wrong, sorry about that", hold the onions.

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/sports/football/nfl/carolina_panthers/10292786.htm

 

This is another example of your bullshit. You said earlier that Colbert, in the first Tampa game, dropped a pass before Muhammad's go ahead TD. The problem is that Muhammad never caught the go ahead TD. He didn't even catch a TD in that game. Your using this as an outlet, something you had in your back pocket in case I proved you were wrong. A clever device, I'll give you that much. But it doesn't mean that "Bed & Breakfast" didn't expose you for what you are.

 

Nope. I know you're looking for the kill shot - in itself, very funny how you can go from reluctant "I don't know if we can keep Moose" to this hilarity - but I had the points wrong. I remembered the Colbert drop, but it was in the second game, right before the Muhammad TD I referenced. In the second game.

So yippee - you picked a nit. I thought it was in the first TB game, it was in the 2nd. And then in my search, I found one in the first TB game, too. A costly one.

And for all that bluster, you've got a technicality that wins a small portion of a thread that proves that Colbert dropped ten passes. And apparently I can name four off memory, though I'm sure you'll continue to nit pick the fact that I mistook first game for second game, and interpret it as "oh well, that doesn't count"





So I ask - do you have a point? Do you actually have something you're trying to prove, and when are you going to present some sort of case for it? This whole "well, Colbert dropped 4th most passes in the NFL but I bet you can't remember exactly when in 1/3 of the times where you try to recall them" argument isn't getting you anywhere.

 

Part of the promblem here is that you referenced me an article about the first Tampa game, not the second one. Maybe you thought I wouldn't be a registered member at Charlotte.com, or I was just the dumbest fuck ever. So I'm not sure where you're trying to go with that.

We can pick some more nits, for sure. Like the fact Colbert never dropped a pass before Muhammad's TD in the second Tampa game. But I don't wanna get too specific here, I doesn't prove any kinda point.

All of this is sorta relevent, however. You tried to illustrate Moose as the "Hero" by winning the Tampa game (whichever one), and Colbert as the "goat" who misses key opportunities. It would add support to your "we won't be the same without Moose, and worse off with Colbert" arguement. That is, if either of those two things were true. But lets not get too far off topic here.

 

Yes. I was looking for the article about a drop Colbert made in the first game. I was thinking about the second game, and found that on NFL.com play by play. Look for it - second quarter, first play of the quarter.

This isn't so hard.



>>You tried to illustrate Moose as the "Hero" by winning the Tampa game (whichever one), and Colbert as the "goat" who misses key opportunities.

Wow. Never said that. I said plenty of things, try sticking to those. Does Colbert not play up to potential? Yeah. I've said that and say it now. Did that score put us up 14-7? yeah, and that doesn't mean Muhammad singlehandedly won the TB game.


>>It would add support to your "we won't be the same without Moose, and worse off with Colbert" arguement. That is, if either of those two things were true. But lets not get too far off topic here.

So be straight up with me and tell me that Colbert is the same talent of receiver that Muhammad is. By all means, tell me. So you can have a point.

I remember Collin, once, tried to devalue Delhomme by saying that since Delhomme's 03 was the same as Peete's 02, that it was the system, and that Delhomme wasn't all that talented. Therefore we shouldn't pay him.