1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Last Week's Inactives

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Trashman1962, Sep 9, 2003.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Sep 9, 2003 at 4:06 PM #1
    Trashman1962

    Trashman1962 Full Access Member

    Age:
    64
    Posts:
    756
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Listed as inactive for the Jacksonville game were: Weinke, Hampton, Willig, Reyes, Baker, Young, Moorehead, and Rasmussen. Any Observations or Comments?

    I was a little surprised at Moorehead. Once he got over the spider bite, he played well. We left ourselves with only Burton as a sub at DT. Also the receivers, with Baker and Young inactive that means Hankton was our #4 receiver. I don't remember if he got any field time at receiver and I assume the choice there was simply special teams. With Smiths' punt returns, I don't see Baker getting any time unless there is an injury. Colin Branch was active and had 2 special teams tackles. I do not remember them, but that is a good start for Branch.
     
  2. Sep 9, 2003 at 4:11 PM #2
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    it makes sense not to activate Hampton. But keep Brzezinski and Nelson both, but not Willig? If we have an injury, we're playing a center at tackle. And why keep 9 DL if you're going to deactivate two?
     
  3. Sep 9, 2003 at 5:00 PM #3
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
    Yeah

    Willig is hurt (foot)

    I'd like to see either Baker or Young active.
     
  4. Sep 9, 2003 at 5:17 PM #4
    pantherplayersball

    pantherplayersball Member

    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    K.Hankton was in on a couple of plays as a receiver from what I remember.
     
  5. Sep 9, 2003 at 6:29 PM #5
    rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003

    Most notably - he recovered a Foster fumble . . . remember before Foster got hurt what most of us were worried about with him???

    I might be wrong, was it Smith's fumble that Hankton recovered? Both Foster and Smith need to work on keeping the ball tucked and tight.
     
  6. Sep 9, 2003 at 7:50 PM #6
    Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Smith recovered his own fumble. It was Foster's Hank fell on.
     
  7. Sep 9, 2003 at 7:50 PM #7
    lde

    lde Teddy and Gabriel

    Posts:
    4,109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Location:
    Hillsborough, NC
    They've never activated more than 7 that I can remember. I think this is standard leaguewide. You just can't activate more without really hurting yourself at another position. They want to keep guys because OL are always getting injured. If you can't plug in someone decent there is no way to compensate. Plus I think some of them will develop.

    I think Willig had a sprained ankle.
     
  8. Sep 9, 2003 at 7:52 PM #8
    LarryD

    LarryD autodidact polymath

    Posts:
    29,846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Location:
    living the dream
    i thought hankton was part of that goofup on the punt at the goalline.
     
  9. Sep 9, 2003 at 7:54 PM #9
    hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    He was.
     
  10. Sep 9, 2003 at 7:54 PM #10
    Trashman1962

    Trashman1962 Full Access Member

    Age:
    64
    Posts:
    756
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Someone chime in on the rule here, but based on the NFL.com gamebook, that fumble by Foster on the toss from Delhomme is actually recorded as a fumble by Delhomme and a Foster fumble recovery.......a little strange I think.

    Also, I was impressed with what I saw from Foster and at this point I am not concerned he will have a fumbling problem.
     
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page