1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

How

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by chipshot, Sep 24, 2009.

Page 2 of 3
  1. Sep 25, 2009 at 1:51 PM #11
    Black&Blue

    Black&Blue NKW

    Age:
    80
    Posts:
    20,190
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
     
  2. Sep 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM #12
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    No one is above being replaced by a bunch of average guys.
     
  3. Sep 25, 2009 at 1:58 PM #13
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Sometimes I think we'd be better off without Steve Smith and with a slew of average receivers.
     
  4. Sep 25, 2009 at 2:16 PM #14
    Eighter

    Eighter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    ??????


    I will keep Smith and get rid of Mooose
     
  5. Sep 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM #15
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    To be a good team you need a couple of star players and then solid guys every where else. If you try to fill every position with stars then you are likely going to leave holes in your team. My point is not that an elite DT would not help us but that an elite DT is no necessary as long as you have some solid guys to rotate and have stars at other spots. With Beason, Davis, Peppers and Gamble we should be able to fill out the rest of the defense with role players and be pretty darn good. Unfortunately we are playing guys who are below "roll player" stats at DT and safety right now.

    The problem on D goes beyond a lack of talent though. Either Meeks' system sucks or our guys are not picking it up yet.
     
  6. Sep 25, 2009 at 4:46 PM #16
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Meeks' 'tampa 2' system has historically had the most success with an elite DT at the under tackle spot.
    I like how peppers goes from:
    to a guy we should build around. Role, BTW.
     
  7. Sep 25, 2009 at 4:49 PM #17
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    they like Lewis, but he's gotta show he can be that guy in this system - alternately it'd help to have a real player at the NT spot too. I'm sure Lewis has to stay at home more.

    But while this scheme is ideal for Lewis, would still like to see it happen.
     
  8. Sep 25, 2009 at 5:02 PM #18
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    It's what he was drafted for.
     
  9. Sep 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM #19
    Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    In 2001.
     
  10. Sep 25, 2009 at 6:33 PM #20
    Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    In 2001.
     
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page