1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Half Full

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by meatpile, Dec 22, 2008.

Page 2 of 3
  1. Dec 23, 2008 at 3:10 PM #11
    buck nasty

    buck nasty Full Access Member

    Posts:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    didn't the giants beat us the regular season we skunked them in the playoffs?
     
  2. Dec 23, 2008 at 3:33 PM #12
    NewFaceOfFailure

    NewFaceOfFailure SLOOTS!!!

    Posts:
    2,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Location:
    Cali
    CHICAGO....
     
  3. Dec 24, 2008 at 12:23 AM #13
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Depends on how long Pat Williams is out. When healthy, you don't want to play the Vikings. Now that they've finally wised up and put Jackson back in over Frerotte, they're a dangerous playoff team.
     
  4. Dec 24, 2008 at 1:57 AM #14
    solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Tend to disagree after his scintillating performance against Atlanta.
     
  5. Dec 24, 2008 at 2:05 AM #15
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    TJ had 4 scores vs Az and I thought he was hot; until I saw Az against NE and TJ against Atlanta
     
  6. Dec 24, 2008 at 9:37 AM #16
    Clay

    Clay Full Access Member

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    5,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    I think the Vikings loss to ATL was more about the fact they kept putting the ball on the turf, not Jackson's performance.
     
  7. Dec 24, 2008 at 9:49 AM #17
    blackcatfan

    blackcatfan Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    3 of those 7 fumbles were Jackson's. 2 resulted in turnovers
     
  8. Dec 24, 2008 at 10:31 AM #18
    solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    again...SCINTILLATING.
     
  9. Dec 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM #19
    Southern_Yankee

    Southern_Yankee Full Access Member

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    19,348
    Likes Received:
    131
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Location:
    up'air
    Half Empty :agreed:
     
  10. Dec 24, 2008 at 10:57 AM #20
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    You mean the one where he had a 98.5 rating, 233 passing yards, 76 rushing yards, 61.1% completions, 2 touchdowns, and no interceptions? Even the fumbles weren't really his fault. One was a handoff that Adrian Peterson botched (it always gets charged to the QB if the RB doesn't get the ball cleanly, even if it's the RB's fault) and another was when one of his linemen let Moorehead blast Jackson when he wasn't expecting it. Seriously, there is zero question that the kid played very well against Atlanta, so you need to rethink your position.
     
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page