Everyone in the world thought we upgraded at QB...

lolz, coward and a liar, punch.

 

I don't hate Carr at all...he's just not a good QB.

BTW, as soon as Carr came in the game, I told my dad that some yahoo would take down his stats, after he completed a bunch of short passes in garbage time, and use them to show how damn good he is. Good job, yahoo!

 

I must have missed this one.

He was a good game manager most of the time, but he was too loose with the ball today.

 

I didn't take down anything, I simply looked them up a minute ago when meatpile was bitching about him. And from that statement am I to take it that you're still living at home? I'm going to feel exceptionally retarded for arguing with you if you're like 16 or something.

Oh, and I like how you have no answer whatsoever for the stats, so you just dismiss them out of hand. That isn't indicative of bias at all, nosiree.

 

my answer would typically be "we needed more than 4.1/pass from either or both of them regardless of who they were."

especially with the Colts sitting on such a huge lead.

 

I completely agree.

 

That was awesome. He connected on that shit.

 

Except for the times when I've been out of the country or out of town, I've always come home to watch the games with my dad. You got a problem with that?

And the answer is garbage time. You see, if you knew about football, you would realize that when a team has a good lead late in the game, they tend to give up the short passes because they can't hurt them anymore. Therefore, Carr's stats are quite lame. Wheras, earlier in the game when Vinny was completing short passes, it was useful because it kept the chains moving when the game was still in doubt.

I wasn't overly excited about Vinny's performance either, but at least he sustained a long drive and got us a TD. We probably would have lost this game no matter what, but at least I felt like we had a half a chance with Vinny. As soon as Carr came in the game, I knew we were screwed. I promise you I'm not the only one.

 

Um......

Vinny played the first half and the score was 7-10.

Carr played the second half and the score was 0-21.

Is there really a question, which QB was the better leader? Vinny and the offense held the ball for 22 minutes in the first half. Carr and the offense held the ball for 13 minutes.

Honestly. I have not watched the game yet, but the STATS are obvious. A Vinny led office held the ball and dominated the time of possession.

The STATS show 3 lost fumbles and an INT. The STATS show that the Panthers played well enough to win, but TURNOVERS killed the team.

I'll watch the game tonight and revisit my opinion.

 

Texans fans didn't

one told me the day Carr was signed that if he ever saw the field he would be hated in Carolina