1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

bc/unc

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by Village Idiot, Mar 11, 2006.

  1. WYDD

    WYDD Everybody dance now.

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    4,147
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Tegucigalpa
    bc has a better record. a better record vs the top 25. they beat carolina TWICE. and they've won 5 in a row heading into tomorrow. rpi means nothing if you talk about head to head when the teams are this close as far as records.
     
  2. Dukesuckgounc

    Dukesuckgounc Let's go Panthers

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    9,431
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Near you
    What about Strength of Schedule .BC has a has a better record do to the fact that they play very bad team
     
  3. WYDD

    WYDD Everybody dance now.

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    4,147
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Tegucigalpa
    they may have a better record because of some of the teams they played, but that isn't their fault. when put up against a team that is pretty much equal, they beat them. TWICE.
     
  4. Village Idiot

    Village Idiot cloud of dust

    Age:
    67
    Posts:
    17,664
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Location:
    Soggy Bottom
    must:banginghe stop:banginghe reading:banginghe this:banginghe stuff:banginghe
     
  5. Dukesuckgounc

    Dukesuckgounc Let's go Panthers

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    9,431
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Near you
    The Fact is a team in the acc should not play team that there RPI is 300.I bet if UNC play all this bad team that BC play UNC would have a better record then BC
     
  6. solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    easy there collin...i never said they werent a 3...why dont we wait til sunday, hmmm?

    no way they are a 2, in my book anyway, but 4, likely, 3 maybe.
     
  7. solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    dukey just found his way onto my ignore list. i cant read stupidity like that anymore.

    oh, and dont send me emails either "john in charlotte".....they aint gettin read.
     
  8. sockittome16

    sockittome16 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    In the words of Sean Marshall from BC "Welcome to the ACC Carolina"
     
  9. kickazzz2000

    kickazzz2000 CURRENTLY ON THE CAN

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    3,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Location:
    Doylestown, PA
    In 2000, Heels were 9-7 in ACC, UVa was 9-7 in ACC, beat UNC twice.

    Heels went to tourney, UVa didnt get.


    Heels proved their worth by going to final 4 (got a little lucky too) and UVa lost to Georgetown i believe it was, in the NIT...

    juss sayin...
     
  10. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Dukey, please shut the fuck up.

    Stop being a retard. Bilas and the others were talking about Carolina being a lock for #2 if they won the ACC Tournament. They didn't, but they barely lost to a very good BC team, so if you think that drops them from being arguably the top #3 seed to somehow being a 4th seed, well that's just stupid. Dukey is obviously retarded about UNC deserving a #2, but his facts and figures all show that UNC is clearly in the top 12 by any measure. So tell me, what is 12 divided by 4?
     

Share This Page