1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

5, 37, 69

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by T_M_Schroll, Dec 4, 2012.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Dec 4, 2012 at 9:36 PM #11
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    ugh. You're right.
     
  2. Dec 4, 2012 at 10:40 PM #12
    NewFaceOfFailure

    NewFaceOfFailure SLOOTS!!!

    Posts:
    2,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Location:
    Cali
    So is that a no to de'anthony Thomas :(
     
  3. Dec 4, 2012 at 11:37 PM #13
    PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,612
    Likes Received:
    2,843
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    I think we traded last years 3 for Olsen? No 7th for Campbell from Raiders or was it to SF for that Special teamer
     
  4. Dec 4, 2012 at 11:52 PM #14
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    3rd was for alexander.
     
  5. Dec 5, 2012 at 12:57 AM #15
    CelticCat

    CelticCat ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED

    Posts:
    3,964
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    This is probably as solid as you can get matching needs.

    5. Te'o
    37. Kevin Minter
    69. Alex Ogletree

    I like linebackers. especially these 3.

    But seriously, if Star and Luke are gone im probably seeking a trade down.


    early teens.) Warmack
    37.) Flucker
    pair of 3rd rounders picked up in the trade down.) Rambo FS (Ogletree is standout value here tho) and either Williams SS, Trufant CB or gamble on the honeybadger Mathieu.
     
  6. Dec 5, 2012 at 1:42 AM #16
    CelticCat

    CelticCat ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED

    Posts:
    3,964
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    You may not rate them as top 10-15 picks but surely by now you know QB's value get elavated in the draft every year. The rookie salary cap makes it even more loopy. Just look at the recent history. Plus, you factor in the historic success of last years class and its almost guarenteed those 2 go top 10, likely top 5, maybe even 1 and 2 again.
     
  7. Dec 5, 2012 at 7:46 AM #17
    y2b

    y2b King of QC

    Posts:
    18,664
    Likes Received:
    213
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Trade down trade down trade down.... We need to take 3 picks and turn them into 8 or more and take best player available, we need everything
     
  8. Dec 5, 2012 at 3:01 PM #18
    Swag Newton

    Swag Newton Ball So Hard.

    Posts:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2012
    :pokestick:

    :57:

    :deal2:

    :grouphug:

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 5, 2012
  9. Dec 6, 2012 at 9:14 AM #19
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    It's amusing that you act like you know enough to disagree with someone like me. 2010, 2008, 2007, and 2005 only had one quarterback selected in the top fifteen picks, while 2001 and 2000 had only one quarterback selected in the entire first round. Meanwhile look at the teams with the worst record and note how many will even be looking for quarterbacks. Kansas City, sure. Maybe Jacksonville if they're willing to give up on Gabbert (which they should). Arizona should be looking. Then I guess the Jets, but I really don't see them going the rookie route again. So you're depending on two out of those three teams burning a top ten pick on a QB nobody likes. Not going to happen.
     
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page