1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

#241 Geoff Schwartz

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by McFly41, Apr 27, 2008.

Page 5 of 6
  1. May 5, 2008 at 10:43 AM #41
    chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland
    I read quite a few profiles about him. There was one that mentioned him as possibly moving to G. The rest have him as an underrated T.
     
  2. May 5, 2008 at 1:55 PM #42
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    My guess. I don't think it was ever fully implemented, and couldn't be added in as we went along because of the Qb situation.

    I said Schwartz possibly at G and was mocked, but whatever. It's not like taking an OT and putting him at G has never been done. Until he's declared a definite OT, it's still a possibility. But I'm fine with however they use him, I'm not married to the idea or even pushing it, just speculating.
     
  3. May 5, 2008 at 2:09 PM #43
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    link?
     
  4. May 5, 2008 at 3:07 PM #44
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    I'd have to look. It was one of those days when everyone was mocking shit. Somebody said RB, S, or something. No big deal, I can take it.

    But if he actually does end up at G, then I'll be sure to drag it up :SmokinBanana:
     
  5. May 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #45
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    OK, just wondering.
    Him at guard isn't unreasonable, but guys like that end up going to guard either because of need (we have plenty) or because they're not able to play OT. I don't think that really applies, he just needs a year to develop some technique to stay active as a backup.
     
  6. May 5, 2008 at 3:59 PM #46
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    That narrows it down.
     
  7. May 5, 2008 at 4:12 PM #47
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Lol, sure does.
     
  8. May 12, 2008 at 8:52 AM #48
    stevemb1

    stevemb1 Junior Member

    Posts:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Location:
    Westlake Village, Ca
    Schwartz

    I hear the new line coach wants a bigger line that is why they drafted three guys over 340........ I heeard Geoff had a really good mini camp..
     
  9. May 12, 2008 at 2:01 PM #49
    Purrsy

    Purrsy Full Access Member

    Posts:
    6,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    We have two Geoffs now. Not a Geoff and a Jeff, but two Geoffs. Theyre both OL, too. And white.

    THis is a sign.
     
  10. May 12, 2008 at 9:31 PM #50
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    A sign of what? breakout year for #80?
     
Page 5 of 6

Share This Page