1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Star power

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Purrsy, Sep 19, 2013.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Sep 19, 2013 at 11:38 AM #1
    Purrsy

    Purrsy Full Access Member

    Posts:
    6,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
  2. Sep 20, 2013 at 2:30 AM #2
    Fhsballin21

    Fhsballin21 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    he's done well on an otherwise unproductive line, he's held his own...the complete opposite as that fatass pile of pussy ass shit Fua, Star plays pissed and likes to throw lineman around like dolls with his brute strength, he's like a Jenkins, with better work ethic, better body, and more of a Tonga instead of a lazy fatass alcoholic with many god given talents (Jenkins)
     
  3. Sep 20, 2013 at 2:31 AM #3
    Fhsballin21

    Fhsballin21 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    I'm just hoping he can give us the same production as Jenkins did for a number of years even a few straight years would be something we haven't had since Kris was traded
     
  4. Sep 20, 2013 at 6:57 AM #4
    Black&Blue_

    Black&Blue_ _

    Posts:
    7,603
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    We need to get a little more creative with him. And Ron needs to stop sending in our B-Team line so much. Occasionally rotating is fine but I don't like seeing Colin Cole and Mario Addison stuck in the game for half a quarter.
     
  5. Sep 20, 2013 at 8:12 AM #5
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    That's the only downside to him playing the nose so well, that they probably won't let him move to the under where Jenkins played. Nose means more double teams, more traffic, and fewer opportunities to get after the quarterback.
     
  6. Sep 20, 2013 at 8:38 PM #6
    buck nasty

    buck nasty Full Access Member

    Posts:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    yeah but "they" wont be here long
     
  7. Sep 21, 2013 at 6:29 AM #7
    Fhsballin21

    Fhsballin21 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    well i've always advocated Star being starting 3 tech not 1 that isn't his strength he cannot disrupt the offensive line as easily as when in 3 tech where he dtraight dominates fuckers
     
  8. Sep 24, 2013 at 11:58 PM #8
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    This week, graded 1st in overall ROY, nearest defensive guy is Richardson at +4

    1. Star Lotulelei, DT, CAR: +7.8
     
  9. Sep 25, 2013 at 9:15 AM #9
    Purrsy

    Purrsy Full Access Member

    Posts:
    6,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Richardson's having a good year, huh? Interesting. I didn't figure he'd be a great fit in that defense. He was the guy I wanted - but I'm so so fucking glad we got Star.
     
  10. Sep 25, 2013 at 10:20 AM #10
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    I wanted him too, but because I could see no way we'd have a shot at Star and I wanted a DT or OT badly. Figured the good OTs were going to be gone and I think that's how it played out.

    Richardson would have helped us too and I'd have been good with him. Better with Star though, he was the most desirable player for me, for us.
     
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page