1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Beason likely to IR

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by solarte, Oct 24, 2012.

Page 2 of 3
  1. Oct 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM #11
    law1ng2b2

    law1ng2b2 Full Access Member

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    1,985
    Likes Received:
    101
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    $12 mil...but yeah...it's a lot. His cap number for 2013 would be $9.5 mil if we kept him.
     
  2. Oct 24, 2012 at 12:23 PM #12
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    It's really a choice between having multiple seasons of manageable pain that makes it hard to win or one season of replacement-level football with potentially no wins. I prefer the latter because that would allow the franchise to rebuild much more quickly. If you carry $50 million in dead cap for 2013 then Carolina might go 0-16, but at least that means the cap room in 2014 to start rebuilding the roster.
     
  3. Oct 24, 2012 at 12:42 PM #13
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
    Headed to IR as I type...
     
  4. Oct 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM #14
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    Scheme would matter going forward, re: ILB/OLB. Or 3-4, obviously.
     
  5. Dec 21, 2012 at 6:56 PM #15
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
  6. Dec 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM #16
    Jaz

    Jaz Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    NOLA
    He is a lesser player on the outside and still has to show he can stay healthy now. His contract makes me think they will ask him to re-structure.
     
  7. Dec 21, 2012 at 11:01 PM #17
    goodoleboy

    goodoleboy Full Access Member

    Posts:
    243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Interesting thought. Think Rivera would stay for a purge like that? Sounds somewhat like the lame duck situation Fox found himself in. I don't see a new guy coming in wanting to deal with that his first year. Its all about win now.
     
  8. Dec 22, 2012 at 9:50 AM #18
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    No, Rivera wouldn't stay in that situation, but Richardson would never go for it anyway. I get the feeling they're going to make as few cuts as possible and drag out this disaster.
     
  9. Dec 22, 2012 at 4:47 PM #19
    y2b

    y2b King of QC

    Posts:
    18,664
    Likes Received:
    213
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Would Beason & Keekly both play inside in a 3-4 ?
     
  10. Dec 22, 2012 at 5:25 PM #20
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    They would. It's not the only thing to consider of course, but yeah, they would.

    Beason to SLB also wouldn't be a terrible thing.
     
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page