1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Richard Marshall - signed w/AZ Cardinals

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by The Special One, Jul 30, 2011.

Page 3 of 4
  1. Jul 30, 2011 at 4:12 PM #21
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    what positives do you see? I don't see much better than Marshall here. Got benched a couple times down the stretch. I see a more expensive Munnerlyn, except Captain finally started playing the ball this year.
     
  2. Jul 30, 2011 at 8:36 PM #22
    udontknowme

    udontknowme Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
  3. Jul 30, 2011 at 8:43 PM #23
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
    CB Asante Samuel too expensive for Panthers after recent spending spree.
    42 seconds ago Favorite Retweet Reply

    carolinagrowl Steve Reed
    Updating an earlier tweet, I spoke with a reliable source that tells me the Panthers are NOT interested in trading for CB Asante Samuel.
     
  4. Jul 30, 2011 at 8:55 PM #24
    udontknowme

    udontknowme Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Finally a prudent decision for this offseason. They don't need to go trading any more picks.
     
  5. Jul 31, 2011 at 11:33 AM #25
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    The Marshall comparison makes no sense precisely because Marshall both gives up completions and gets burned deep repeatedly. Remember the link where he had the worst burn rate in the NFL last season? Meanwhile what I like about Rogers is that he doesn't get burned much because he doesn't take chances and jump routes. He's boring, but he's solid, and I'll take that from a corner. It's not ideal, since Josh Wilson would have been a lot better, but at this point the team is picking from leftovers.
     
  6. Jul 31, 2011 at 11:44 AM #26
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    fair enough. I just don't think he's good. He gets picked on a ton, not just a matter of being safe.
     
  7. Jul 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM #27
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    He's not good, but at this point my concern is that we don't end up with someone who undermines the whole defense by being a major weakness.
     
  8. Jul 31, 2011 at 2:22 PM #28
    rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    If samuel is too pricey then so is carlos rogers. Probably going to have to make do until final cuts when some old fart gets trimmed
     
  9. Jul 31, 2011 at 2:24 PM #29
    Purrsy

    Purrsy Full Access Member

    Posts:
    6,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    I don't like Rogers, but why is he too pricey if Samuel is?

    One is a stellar talent, the other is an average and aging one. So...explain?
     
  10. Jul 31, 2011 at 2:30 PM #30
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Samuel would cost a draft pick, and has two years on a contract that pays him pretty well.
     
Page 3 of 4

Share This Page