1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Combine

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by morningwood, Mar 2, 2023.

  1. stirs

    stirs Full Access Member

    Posts:
    3,786
    Likes Received:
    610
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2021
    Location:
    Greensboro
  2. dig-it

    dig-it Wait'n On That Post Rookie Deal

    Posts:
    19,909
    Likes Received:
    2,414
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    The Panthers should find a starter at #9.
     
  3. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    59,844
    Likes Received:
    2,759
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    Supposedly it could be Rodgers.
    Hell no
     
  4. Cyberjag

    Cyberjag RAMFB

    Posts:
    9,022
    Likes Received:
    2,709
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    I don't believe that we're talking to Rodgers. That trade would make no sense for anyone involved but Green Bay.
     
  5. dig-it

    dig-it Wait'n On That Post Rookie Deal

    Posts:
    19,909
    Likes Received:
    2,414
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    OK...
    Actually I was saying they should be able to find a starter in the draft at pick 9 regardless of position.
    No way I want that oddball Rodgers with the Panthers.
     
  6. stirs

    stirs Full Access Member

    Posts:
    3,786
    Likes Received:
    610
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2021
    Location:
    Greensboro
    If we are looking at a 5 year starter at minimum, no way we are bringing in the "odd duck" Rodgers. He has been year to year and all about himself for the last 5. Just kicking tires and making everyone guess our path is my take. AKA smoke and mirrors
     
    PantherPaul likes this.
  7. presidence99

    presidence99 es lo que hay.

    Posts:
    16,338
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Tepper is impatient Rhule said his timeline (however stupid) was blown up immediately

    Tepper says you need a QB to win

    Fuck dem picks is the hip new thing of last year

    Perfectly plausible that we want in

    In theory Rhule only answered to Tepper re personnel do we know who ended up with the roster authority after he left? Did fitterer let tepper have more input to get another rung up the ladder? Or did reich get the same power Rhule did?
     
  8. rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    I am getting that "desperation vibe" already from Reich and I could see him going with the "trade up, or reach at 9" for his damn starting rookie QB. Reich and staff should be smart enough and experienced enough to build an offensive scheme around ANY QB. .. whether it's Darnold, or Hooker, or a damn 7th round 4th string rook.
     
  9. Cyberjag

    Cyberjag RAMFB

    Posts:
    9,022
    Likes Received:
    2,709
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    [​IMG]
     
    morningwood likes this.
  10. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    59,844
    Likes Received:
    2,759
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    Just resign Darnold for 2 years and draft a qb in 2nd Rd
     
    CoachMcFly likes this.

Share This Page