1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Los Angeles Rams

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by PantherPaul, Jan 12, 2016.

  1. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,612
    Likes Received:
    2,843
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    And possibly the Los Angeles Chargers if they want. NFL approves moves
     
  2. rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Rotoworld says;

    >>>>The league will give the Chargers and Raiders $100 million each in compensation if either decides to stay put but we're guessing the Chargers will eventually align with the Rams and share a stadium in Inglewood. The Chargers' preference was to split a venue with the Raiders in Carson but the owners preferred Stan Kroenke's Inglewood proposal. Assuming the Chargers and Rams come to an agreement, those teams will likely play in the Los Angeles Coliseum until the new stadium in Inglewood is ready. The $1.8 billion construction should be completed by 2019.<<<<



    Sounds pretty goofy. Apparently the chargers were willing to share a stadium with the raiders . .. that would be a cluster fuck
     
  3. Black&Black

    Black&Black Delivering Smiles

    Posts:
    40,512
    Likes Received:
    14,953
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    It makes more sense to split it with the Rams, but there's supposedly a bloody history between Kroenke and Spanos.
     
  4. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,612
    Likes Received:
    2,843
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    I'm sure there's a good reason byt why do the charger s want to leave San Diego. Kronke has the money and the land ready to go.
     
  5. Black&Black

    Black&Black Delivering Smiles

    Posts:
    40,512
    Likes Received:
    14,953
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    "Because more money" is the short answer to virtually every question in life.
     
  6. presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    for more on this paul:

    check out this list of largest TV markets that's all the owners are looking at even though LA hasn't supported teams in the past. you theoretically have a huge population to sell games to and it comes in handy when negotiating TV deals.
     
  7. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    That argument only makes sense if having a team or two in L.A. actually increases viewership in that market, which I strongly doubt.
     
  8. stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    I think the Rams, since they used to be the LA Rams, might have a chance. 2 teams? Not too sure about that.
     
  9. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,612
    Likes Received:
    2,843
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    Spanos got shit on. Instead of a open vote they did a blind vote and he lost 20-12. Kronke came in prepared to write a 1.5 billion dollar check got attention. Now Goodell is making Spanos the best deal possible even though they will be leasing from kronke. Oakland fucked themselves when they said no to sharing a stadium with the Niners
     
  10. Black&Black

    Black&Black Delivering Smiles

    Posts:
    40,512
    Likes Received:
    14,953
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    The Oakland situation is so bizarre. They're essentially homeless at the moment.
     

Share This Page