New FB

I really have a hard time believing they're going to waive a starting FB for a concussion.
While it's nice Felton is here, he hasn't been in on any play that I can recall so far where he hasn't gotten the ball. Brockel has done all the blocking, and he's not sticking. Felton might stick, and if there's room I hope he does, but a reasonable person might suggest they should see him block.

 

Yeah man, you're not allowed to post your opinion on these forums without saying "I think," "maybe," or "excuse me for having this belief but while acknowledging that this is just my opinion I would like to express the idea that ______."

All that said, Fiammetta hasn't been the blocker I hoped. The absence of Hoover last season was really noticeable.

 

it does help to not call opinions facts. Those are very different words. For other people.

 

The trouble with Fiametta is you don't notice him and as a lead blocker that's a problem

 

It also helps not to lie about people calling opinions facts.

 

Lol.

Yeah. I know there are a lot of guys who like Fiammetta, but the guy is weak. Time to move on, Felton or no Felton.

I've always wondered why no one mentioned Hoover's loss as well as Otah's. We keep hearing Otah this, Otah that, the run has suffered because of the loss of our RT, but what about the weak FB play?

 

it helps to not lie about people lying.

 

I liked our run game a lot better today with Otah in than with any fullback.

 

Feel free to show where I said my opinions are facts, or in lieu of that, you can stop being such a passive-aggressive little bitch.

 

It helps with Otah back, and a salty FB who can hit, yes. I agree.

(I think you know I'm not saying the FB play is more important than getting Otah back, so let's be intellectually honest here) xD