1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

contract-year QBs

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by LarryD, Sep 14, 2009.

Page 5 of 7
  1. Sep 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM #41
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    no one here is that stupid.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2009
  2. Sep 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM #42
    rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003

    . .. and how's that been workin for the panters only having one target to go to???

    smittys glory days are over as long as there is no other significant receiving threat to draw defensive attention . . . opponents have kinda figured out how to just account for one guy, and it doesn't seem to matter what a badass smitty and his following seem to think he is
     
  3. Sep 15, 2009 at 1:18 PM #43
    rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003

    fixed
     
  4. Sep 15, 2009 at 1:40 PM #44
    Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Not sure I'd put him in the top 20 in the NFL, so he's at best a #2 on most teams. He' a speed guy who has lost a step IMO, and really had only one top statistical season. Not an elite talent, no.

    Our backs are clearly better. We have an elite WR talent. I'd rate Moose as a reciever still higher than Randle El. Neither has much proven in depth.

    They have the better TE.
     
  5. Sep 16, 2009 at 12:00 AM #45
    Parker

    Parker Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Location:
    Wilmington, NC
    I'd take Pennington and think Campbell could be much better than he's played.
     
  6. Sep 16, 2009 at 6:40 AM #46
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    Campbell has not gotten it done so far in DC but he has shown a few flashes and has a big arm. If we go after a free agent QB in the offseason he is probably as good as anyone else that will be available and better than most. He is also still young. Ideally you want a guy like him to have to compete with another decent QB for the starting spot. You do not want to sign him and assume he is your new franchise QB. It is worth noting that the skins rallied to make the playoffs a couple of years ago when Campbell got hurt and his backup played well.
     
  7. Sep 16, 2009 at 10:19 AM #47
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,930
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    why is that worth noting?
     
  8. Sep 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM #48
    CharlottePirate

    CharlottePirate Full Access Member

    Posts:
    251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Trade for David Garrard
     
  9. Sep 17, 2009 at 3:49 PM #49
    Dbag21

    Dbag21 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Location:
    north of Charlotte
    choosing from that list is like choosing death by the chair or the chamber
    the end result is the same
     
  10. Sep 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM #50
    hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    I wouldn't mind Campbell being brought in to push Jake. Even if he's only a backup, I'd feel a lot better about him than McCown or Moore. I think our offense is much better suited to his strengths.
     
Page 5 of 7

Share This Page