1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

DJ Hackett to visit Tampa and Carolina

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Carrboro Panther, Mar 12, 2008.

Page 6 of 12
  1. Mar 13, 2008 at 11:54 AM #51
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    I'll spell it out back to you...I get what you're saying and disagree.
     
  2. Mar 13, 2008 at 12:00 PM #52
    Golden Hammer

    Golden Hammer South Pole Elf

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    10,189
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Location:
    Charlotte
    I hope he does put up great numbers....but I'm afraid if Moose IS our #2....we'll regret not spending money on a #2 with some speed, and Smitty's numbers will suffer.
     
  3. Mar 13, 2008 at 12:05 PM #53
    y2b

    y2b King of QC

    Posts:
    18,664
    Likes Received:
    213
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    we're going to suck if Moose is the best we got at #2... I'll wager that shit all fucking day...
     
  4. Mar 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM #54
    hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    :soda: I laffed.
     
  5. Mar 13, 2008 at 1:26 PM #55
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    I don't think there's really anything that we can do, speed or not speed, that will keep teams from focusing on Smith. It doesn't mean we'll always have man elsewhere, which is a very common misconception.

    And, at any rate, if it's just speed, we have Ryne Robinson to sub in. Speed with Carter didn't matter, did it?
     
  6. Mar 13, 2008 at 1:28 PM #56
    chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland
    we already suck, he is an upgrade to anybody we had other than Smith
     
  7. Mar 13, 2008 at 1:41 PM #57
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    I disagree. Moose is still a good posession receiver. With the defense focused on Smith he will enough. He will fight for the ball and hang on to it better than Colbert or Carter.
     
  8. Mar 13, 2008 at 1:44 PM #58
    Golden Hammer

    Golden Hammer South Pole Elf

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    10,189
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Location:
    Charlotte

    Maybe I should rephrase. I think Moose commands some respect from the DBs....but not enough to really give Smitty much help. I'd like to see us bring in someone who forces defenses to make a decision. I believe we need either a really solid posession reciever (Proehl), or a big time reciever, to make D's pay for getting it wrong and give Smitty some more space.
     
  9. Mar 13, 2008 at 1:51 PM #59
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    I predict Moose to put up at least 800 yards and 5 touchdowns. DW to rush for 1300 yards and 10 touchdowns and Smith to rack up 1200 yards and 12 touchdowns. King will be the third leading receiver and catch 400 yards and 6 TDs.
     
  10. Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM #60
    y2b

    y2b King of QC

    Posts:
    18,664
    Likes Received:
    213
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    800 yards? that's a lot of balls going his way... i can't see him getting much of it in YAC
     
Page 6 of 12

Share This Page