asterisk

Time to break him out...

 

It's still a violation if the league rules are not followed. No team can override league rules. If there is an exception stated in the rule, show it to us. I haven't found it. That is only intended to mean what it says. I accept the possibility that it exists but need more proof that PK.

How can you possibly say "always granted" then immediately contradict it? Doesn't that sound pretty stupid?

I'm still waiting for your interpretation of the quote from the NFL Constitution and By laws above.

 

*
​

 

Depsite all the recent bullshit, most of their success is legit. They've presented the model of how to be successful in the modern NFL, through have successful drafts and being able to use money on great players, and having the balls to cut guys who are past their prime. You don't win three Super Bowls, 4 SB appearences in seven years, just by video taping signals.

I do have trouble putting them in the same class with Dallas and San Francisco, because those teams were truly dominant. New England won their Super Bowls by a combined 9 points.

 

It's just my opinion but I think it's entirely possible that having the video of a final walkthrough could could have changed 1 play of the 120 or so that make a game. 1 play could make the difference between a drive continuing or stalling. It'd change the entire game. As you said, the margin of victory was not very big to begin with.

 

I don't need to research anything for your benefit. I'm not here to satisfy your requests in any way and this is not a court of law. I know from my own experience that it is a regular practice for teams to video from the endzones. Also, this topic was covered for the entire season on Sirius NFL radio where ex coaches and executives like PK all agreed that endzone taping is a regular practice.

Give it rest and stop being so cunty. I guess I'll clarify for the retards out there...it is almost always granted. After 10+ years in the front office and coaching on the sidelines, PK only remembers one time it was not. I hope that makes you feel better.

 

You know you come off as a bitter Carolina fan, right?

 

hahaha you don't want to know what you come off as

 

I wasn't asking you to do any research. I was asking you to back up your claims. You can't. That makes you a lying sack of fecal material.

10+ years in the front office and coaching on the sidelines equates to 160 or so games. FOR THAT TEAM. That leaves a bunch of games involving 28 -31 other teams that he had no involvement in what so ever. He is talking out of his ass. Or of course that could be just you jabbering off from the anus since you haven't shown one article where Pat even said that.

Actually didn't change a thing. You posted that something "always" happens then gave an example of when it didn't. That's stupid. Trying to make your stupidity my issue is equally as stupid.

 

The Panthers did about as well as could be expected under their situation this year. There is nothing to be bitter about when luck turns things against the team. But your Pats seem to have gone a little bit beyond what is allowed in the rules to compensate for the "luck" pendulum. The talk about the tanished accomplishments is not just by me. The investigation goes all the way back to the Pats-Rams Superbowl. I don't think there is a lot of question in anybody's mind other than your of who is displaying the bitterness. It'll get worse as the Pats' accomplishments continue to get tagged with disclaimers.