Has anyone heard the rumor

Perhaps in a real life situation, I'd wager you're correct. But on the internet, where anger, indignation and flaming idiots have no limits, feeding the fire is counterproductive.

 

Interesting dogma, Collin. When is the last time you or your Republican heros have been effective in anything they have done outside of bullying and bullshitting? Your posture does more harm by means of clouding the truth in your message.

And yes, I agree with your POV and your base message. Problem is, I and the majority of humans in this world would rather spite you than agree publicly and give you credibility. Humans have a built in ability to know how people like you wield power, which is the reason we handed you and your Republican heros their asses in the last election. It is the reason no one respects you as an authority regardless of the fact that you are generally correct. Sometimes the devil will tell you the brutal truth as well, depending on how it ultimately serves him.

So don't buck up, Jack. You'll always be a loser until you understand humility. We will make sure of it. Democracy and effectiveness rule. We will generally figure out the truth ourselves and certainly don't need leaders like you telling it to us. Learn it.

 

Don't lump republicans in with Collin.

 

Doesn't matter if you come at me sideways or if you try to have a reasonable discussion on the matter, I won't change my position. So yea, best to just occupy your dick beaters elsewhere rather than respond any further.

Because I choose to take a different perspective and compare Vick purely as a passer and not as a runner doesn't make me wrong. Nor does it make anyone else right for thier thinking including the rushing info. It's simply a different perspective.

Having an opinion or looking at thing differently is so threatening to some, because it steps outside of thier liniar world. Fuck it, take the stick out of your ass, it's not like statistical data isn't used that way on the regular...that is, used selectively to prove a desired outcome. Pull one catagory and you get a totally different conclusion from the data.

 

Vick is a different kind of QB. It has yet to be proven that a team can win consistently or win a championship with a quarterback like Vick. I do not think it is likely that you can do those things with a "hybrid" QB but I could be proven wrong. Like John Fox says though it is what it is. Trying to make Vick into Peyton Manning is not going to work. Even turning him into McNabb is probably not going to work. Build your offense to cater to him and what he does well and see how far you get. Either that or cut him loose and start over. Either one is better than trying to force him to be something he is not.

Of course as a Panthers fan I hope they keep doing what they have been doing with him for as long as he plays.

 

This is like putting on red-tinted sun glasses and saying the sky is purple.

While your opinion might be correct in the context of how you're looking at it, it's your perspective that is invalid.

Since yardage, first downs and touchdowns that come from a QB who runs are not thrown out, it's relevant data that must be considered.

 

Big picture, sure. I just chose to shorten the scope.

 

Well I applaud your conviction to your irrelevant perspective. It belongs in the Useless Hall of Fame along with screen doors on submarines and tits on a bull.

 

Did you ever see Barnyard?

That movie should be band until it is rereleased with anatomically correct animals. Utters on a bull, .
Well, the relevance is argueable...never said it wasn't. Vick is neither a God nor a good NFL QB, he at least has a chance at the latter.

 

See Collin? A nice, civil conversation and McFly now realizes that his opinion and perspective is irrelevant.